Garcia G, Smith C I, Weissberg J I, Eisenberg M, Bissett J, Nair P V, Mastre B, Rosno S, Roskamp D, Waterman K
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Sep;107(3):278-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-278.
To determine the efficacy of adenine arabinoside monophosphate (Ara-AMP vidarabine phosphate) with or without human leukocyte interferon in chronic hepatitis B.
Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with 6-month treatment and an 18-month follow-up.
Referral-based liver-disease clinics at three university medical centers.
Twenty-five patients with chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis and 39 with chronic persistent hepatitis.
Thirteen patients received intramuscular Ara-AMP, 2.5 mg/kg body weight, twice daily, alternated monthly for 6 months with subcutaneous human leukocyte interferon, 5 million units, twice daily. Painful paresthesia of the legs necessitated dosage reduction and early discontinuation of enrollment. Twenty-four patients received intramuscular Ara-AMP, 2.5 mg/kg, twice daily, alternated monthly for 6 months with a matching placebo given subcutaneously twice daily. Twenty-seven patients received placebo by intramuscular and subcutaneous injections twice daily for 6 months.
Of the 64 patients, 95% had symptomatic and virologic data available and 64% had biopsies at 12 months; at 24 months, 77% had data available and 56% had repeat biopsies. The highest dropout rate was seen in the group receiving Ara-AMP. The group receiving the placebo was less symptomatic (Karnofsky score of 96% compared with 91% in the group receiving Ara-AMP/placebo and 92% in the group receiving Ara-AMP/human leukocyte interferon, p = 0.02) at 12 but not at 24 months. Loss of DNA polymerase, the hepatitis B e antigen, and the serum hepatitis B virus DNA was similar in all three groups. Histologically, erosion of the limiting plate and lobular activity favored Ara-AMP at 12 but not at 24 months and these differences did not result in differences in the histologic diagnosis.
These results do not support the use of Ara-AMP and human leukocyte interferon in chronic persistent or chronic active hepatitis B.
确定单磷酸阿糖腺苷(Ara - AMP,磷酸阿糖腺苷)联合或不联合人白细胞干扰素治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,治疗6个月,随访18个月。
三个大学医学中心基于转诊的肝病诊所。
25例慢性活动性肝炎或肝硬化患者以及39例慢性持续性肝炎患者。
13例患者接受肌肉注射Ara - AMP,2.5mg/kg体重,每日两次,每月交替使用皮下注射人白细胞干扰素500万单位,每日两次,共6个月。腿部疼痛性感觉异常导致剂量减少并提前停止入组。24例患者接受肌肉注射Ara - AMP,2.5mg/kg,每日两次,每月交替使用皮下注射匹配的安慰剂,每日两次,共6个月。27例患者每日两次接受肌肉注射和皮下注射安慰剂,共6个月。
64例患者中,95%有症状和病毒学数据,64%在12个月时进行了活检;在24个月时,77%有数据,56%进行了重复活检。接受Ara - AMP的组脱落率最高。接受安慰剂的组在12个月时症状较轻(卡诺夫斯基评分96%,接受Ara - AMP/安慰剂组为91%,接受Ara - AMP/人白细胞干扰素组为92%,p = 0.02),但在24个月时并非如此。三组中DNA聚合酶、乙肝e抗原和血清乙肝病毒DNA的消失情况相似。组织学上,12个月时界板侵蚀和小叶活动有利于Ara - AMP,但24个月时并非如此,且这些差异未导致组织学诊断的差异。
这些结果不支持在慢性持续性或慢性活动性乙型肝炎中使用Ara - AMP和人白细胞干扰素。