Finkelstein Joseph, Knight Amy, Marinopoulos Spyridon, Gibbons M Christopher, Berger Zackary, Aboumatar Hanan, Wilson Renee F, Lau Brandyn D, Sharma Ritu, Bass Eric B
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Jun(206):1-1531.
The main objective of the report is to review the evidence on the impact of health information technology (IT) that supports patient-centered care (PCC) on: health care processes; clinical outcomes; intermediate outcomes (patient or provider satisfaction, health knowledge and behavior, and cost); responsiveness to needs and preferences of patients; shared decisionmaking and patient-clinician communication; and access to information. Additional objectives were to identify barriers and facilitators for using health IT to deliver PCC, and to identify gaps in evidence and information needed by patients, providers, payers, and policymakers.
MEDLINE®, Embase®, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, INSPEC, and Compendex databases through July 31, 2010.
Paired members of our team reviewed citations to identify randomized controlled trials of PCC-related health IT interventions and studies that addressed barriers and facilitators for health IT for delivery of PCC. Independent assessors rated studies for quality. Paired reviewers abstracted data.
The search identified 327 eligible articles, including 184 articles on the impact of health IT applications implemented to support PCC and 206 articles addressing barriers or facilitators for such health IT applications. Sixty-three articles addressed both questions. The study results suggested positive effects of PCC-related health IT interventions on health care process outcomes, disease-specific clinical outcomes (for diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cancer, and other health conditions), intermediate outcomes, responsiveness to the needs and preferences of patients, shared decisionmaking, patient-clinician communication, and access to medical information. Studies reported a number of barriers and facilitators for using health IT applications to enable PCC. Barriers included: lack of usability; problems with access to the health IT application due to older age, low income, education, cognitive impairment, and other factors; low computer literacy in patients and clinicians; insufficient basic formal training in health IT applications; physicians' concerns about more work; workflow issues; problems related to new system implementation, including concerns about confidentiality of patient information; depersonalization; incompatibility with current health care practices; lack of standardization; and problems with reimbursement. Facilitators for the utilization of health IT included ease of use, perceived usefulness, efficiency of use, availability of support, comfort in use, and site location.
Despite marked heterogeneity in study characteristics and quality, substantial evidence exists confirming that health IT applications with PCC-related components have a positive effect on health care outcomes. positive effect on health care outcomes.
本报告的主要目标是回顾关于支持以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的健康信息技术(IT)对以下方面影响的证据:医疗保健流程;临床结果;中间结果(患者或提供者满意度、健康知识和行为以及成本);对患者需求和偏好的响应性;共同决策和患者-临床医生沟通;以及信息获取。其他目标是确定使用健康信息技术提供PCC的障碍和促进因素,并确定患者、提供者、付款人和政策制定者所需证据和信息方面的差距。
截至2010年7月31日的MEDLINE®、Embase®、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、PsycINFO、INSPEC和Compendex数据库。
我们团队的配对成员审查文献引用,以识别与PCC相关的健康信息技术干预措施的随机对照试验,以及涉及健康信息技术用于提供PCC的障碍和促进因素的研究。独立评估人员对研究质量进行评级。配对的评审人员提取数据。
检索确定了327篇符合条件的文章,其中包括184篇关于为支持PCC而实施的健康信息技术应用影响的文章,以及206篇涉及此类健康信息技术应用障碍或促进因素的文章。63篇文章同时涉及这两个问题。研究结果表明,与PCC相关的健康信息技术干预措施对医疗保健流程结果、特定疾病临床结果(糖尿病、心脏病、癌症和其他健康状况)、中间结果、对患者需求和偏好的响应性、共同决策、患者-临床医生沟通以及医疗信息获取有积极影响。研究报告了使用健康信息技术应用实现PCC的一些障碍和促进因素。障碍包括:缺乏可用性;由于年龄较大、低收入、教育程度、认知障碍和其他因素导致难以访问健康信息技术应用;患者和临床医生的计算机素养较低;在健康信息技术应用方面缺乏基本的正规培训;医生担心工作量增加;工作流程问题;与新系统实施相关的问题,包括对患者信息保密性的担忧;非个性化;与当前医疗保健实践不兼容;缺乏标准化;以及报销问题。健康信息技术利用的促进因素包括易用性、感知有用性、使用效率、支持的可用性、使用舒适度和地点位置。
尽管研究特征和质量存在明显异质性,但大量证据证实,具有与PCC相关组件的健康信息技术应用对医疗保健结果有积极影响。 对医疗保健结果有积极影响。