Yaghobee Siamak, Samadi Nasrin, Khorsand Afshin, Ghahroudi Amir Ali Rasouli, Kadkhodazadeh Mahdi
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;25(1):87-97. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0039.
This study aimed at comparing the colonization and passage of Streptococcus mutans and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) through polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) membranes loaded with tetracycline, amoxicillin, and chlorhexidine.
In this in vitro study, PTFE and ADM membranes were loaded with tetracycline, amoxicillin, and chlorhexidine. The colonization and crossing of S. mutans and Aa through these membranes were evaluated using vials containing culture medium. Three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used for the statistical analyses (p<0.05).
The membranes loaded with antimicrobial agents significantly decreased bacterial passage compared with the control membranes (not loaded with antimicrobial agents). Significant differences were also detected between membranes in their inhibitory properties (p=0.011). PTFE membrane had higher barrier effect than ADM. Tetracycline had greater antibacterial activity against both species compared with amoxicillin (p=0.021) but had no significant difference with chlorhexidine in this respect (p=0.068). The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine was in between those of tetracycline and amoxicillin, but the difference between amoxicillin and chlorhexidine in this respect was not statistically significant (p=0.992). Aa had better penetration into the membranes compared with S. mutans.
The study results demonstrated that the penetration of S. mutans and Aa decreased into the membranes loaded with tetracycline, amoxicillin, and chlorhexidine and PTFE membrane had a greater barrier effect than ADM. Loading membranes with antimicrobial agents can effectively reduce membrane-associated infections during regenerative procedures.
本研究旨在比较变形链球菌和伴放线聚集杆菌(Aa)通过负载四环素、阿莫西林和氯己定的聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜和脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)膜的定植和通过情况。
在这项体外研究中,PTFE膜和ADM膜负载四环素、阿莫西林和氯己定。使用含有培养基的小瓶评估变形链球菌和Aa通过这些膜的定植和穿越情况。采用三因素方差分析和Tukey真实显著性差异检验进行统计分析(p<0.05)。
与对照膜(未负载抗菌剂)相比,负载抗菌剂的膜显著降低了细菌通过情况。在膜的抑制特性方面也检测到显著差异(p=0.011)。PTFE膜比ADM具有更高的屏障作用。与阿莫西林相比,四环素对这两种菌的抗菌活性更高(p=0.021),但在这方面与氯己定无显著差异(p=0.068)。氯己定的抗菌效果介于四环素和阿莫西林之间,但阿莫西林和氯己定在这方面的差异无统计学意义(p=0.992)。与变形链球菌相比,Aa对膜的穿透性更好。
研究结果表明,变形链球菌和Aa向负载四环素、阿莫西林和氯己定的膜内的渗透减少,且PTFE膜比ADM具有更大的屏障作用。在再生手术过程中,给膜负载抗菌剂可有效减少与膜相关的感染。