Ahmad Arshad, Kant Rama, Gupta Avneet
Department of Surgery, CSM Medical University, Lucknow, UP India.
Indian J Surg. 2013 Aug;75(4):274-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0444-5. Epub 2012 May 6.
Both Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and infrared coagulation (IRC) are well-established techniques in the management of hemorrhoids. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of DG-HAL and IRC in the patients with grade 1 and 2 hemorrhoids. A total of 296 patients were registered for the study, but 51 patients were lost in follow-up; hence, finally 245 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were randomized into two groups (mean age, 42 years; range, 19-60 years). Group A (n = 116) was treated with DG-HAL and group B (n = 129) was treated with IRC. Patients were examined at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after the procedure. Mean time taken for HAL was 21 min and for IRC, 12 min. The cost of the DG-HAL procedure was 1,440 rupees ($31.53) and that of IRC was 376 rupees ($8). The mean duration of hospital stay after HAL was 6 h and after IRC, 2 h. Control of symptoms with HAL was 96 %, whereas with IRC, 81 %. Postoperative complication rate for HAL was 2 %, whereas for IRC, 13 %. Requirement of repeat procedure with HAL was 9 % and with IRC, 28 %. Both the procedures are minimally invasive, associated with minimal discomfort, and suitable for day care surgery. IRC requires lesser procedure time, lesser postoperative hospital stay, and has lower procedure cost, whereas DG-HAL is more effective in controlling symptoms of hemorrhoids, has lower post operative complication rate, and has lesser requirement of repeat procedure.
多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术(DG-HAL)和红外线凝固术(IRC)都是治疗痔疮的成熟技术。本研究的目的是比较DG-HAL和IRC在1、2级痔疮患者中的临床疗效。共有296例患者登记参加本研究,但51例患者失访;因此,最终245例患者纳入分析。患者被随机分为两组(平均年龄42岁;范围19 - 60岁)。A组(n = 116)接受DG-HAL治疗,B组(n = 129)接受IRC治疗。术后1周、1个月和6个月对患者进行检查。HAL的平均手术时间为21分钟,IRC为12分钟。DG-HAL手术费用为1440卢比(31.53美元),IRC为376卢比(8美元)。HAL术后平均住院时间为6小时,IRC为2小时。HAL症状控制率为96%,而IRC为81%。HAL术后并发症发生率为2%,而IRC为13%。HAL重复手术的需求率为9%,IRC为28%。两种手术均为微创手术,不适程度最小,适用于日间手术。IRC所需手术时间更短,术后住院时间更短,手术成本更低,而DG-HAL在控制痔疮症状方面更有效,术后并发症发生率更低,重复手术需求更少。