At the time of this work, Alva O. Ferdinand and Nir Menachemi were with the Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):e39-48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature examining the relationship between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks. We extracted data from abstracts of 206 empirical articles published between 1968 and 2012 and developed a logistic regression model to identify correlates of a detrimental relationship between secondary tasks and driving performance. Of 350 analyses, 80% reported finding a detrimental relationship. Studies using experimental designs were 37% less likely to report a detrimental relationship (P = .014). Studies examining mobile phone use while driving were 16% more likely to find such a relationship (P = .009). Quasi-experiments can better determine the effects of secondary tasks on driving performance and consequently serve to inform policymakers interested in reducing distracted driving and increasing roadway safety.
我们对文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以研究驾驶表现与从事次要任务之间的关系。我们从 1968 年至 2012 年间发表的 206 篇实证文章的摘要中提取数据,并建立了逻辑回归模型,以确定次要任务与驾驶表现之间存在不利关系的相关因素。在 350 项分析中,有 80%的报告发现存在不利关系。采用实验设计的研究报告发现不利关系的可能性降低了 37%(P = .014)。研究驾驶时使用手机的可能性增加了 16%(P = .009)。准实验可以更好地确定次要任务对驾驶表现的影响,从而为有兴趣减少分心驾驶和提高道路安全的政策制定者提供信息。