• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Texting-While-Driving Bans and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Emergency Department Visits in 16 US States: 2007-2014.16 个美国州的驾车时发短信禁令与机动车事故相关的急诊就诊情况:2007-2014 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):748-754. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304999. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Distracted Driving Laws and Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities.分心驾驶法规与机动车事故死亡人数
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3621. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students.美国各州短信使用规定与美国高中生边开车边发短信的普遍程度之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
Impact of texting laws on motor vehicular fatalities in the United States.美国 texting 法规对机动车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1370-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301894. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
6
Texting while driving: does the new law work among healthcare providers?开车时发短信:新法律在医疗保健人员中是否有效?
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;15(5):604-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.4.21273. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
State all-driver distracted driving laws and high school students'  texting while driving behavior.阐述所有关于驾驶员分心驾驶的法律以及高中生的边开车边发短信行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):5-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1041112. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Watch for motorcycles! The effects of texting and handheld bans on motorcyclist fatalities.注意摩托车!禁止发短信和手持设备对摩托车手死亡的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Bans on Cellphone Use While Driving and Traffic Fatalities in the United States.美国的开车时禁止使用手机和交通死亡人数。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001391.
10
Short-term impacts of all-driver handheld cellphone bans on high-schoolers' texting while driving: quasi-experimental analyses of Illinois and Georgia.全司机手持手机禁令对高中生驾车时发短信行为的短期影响:伊利诺伊州和佐治亚州的准实验分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:107014. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107014. Epub 2023 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of using administrative healthcare data to identify risk of motor vehicle crash-related injury: the importance of distinguishing crash from crash-related injury.利用行政医疗保健数据识别机动车碰撞相关损伤风险的意义:区分碰撞与碰撞相关损伤的重要性。
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 12;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00523-3.
2
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The Revolution Will Be Hard to Evaluate: How Co-Occurring Policy Changes Affect Research on the Health Effects of Social Policies.《评估难:政策并存如何影响社会政策健康影响研究》
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):19-32. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab009.
4
What to Do When Everything Happens at Once: Analytic Approaches to Estimate the Health Effects of Co-Occurring Social Policies.当一切同时发生时该怎么办:分析方法估计同时发生的社会政策对健康的影响。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):33-47. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab005.
5
Driving Safety in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病青少年及青年的驾驶安全
Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Nov;33(4):352-357. doi: 10.2337/ds20-0021.
6
Opportunities to Reduce Distracted Driving and Adolescent Driver Motor Vehicle Crashes.减少分心驾驶和青少年驾驶员机动车碰撞事故的机会。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0419. Epub 2020 May 15.
7
Driving Distractions Among Public Health Center Clients: A Look at Local Patterns During the Infancy of Distracted Driving Laws in California.公共卫生中心客户中的驾驶分心行为:加利福尼亚州分心驾驶法律初期的地方模式观察
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 8;7:207. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00207. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand-held cell phone use while driving legislation and observed driver behavior among population sub-groups in the United States.美国关于驾驶时使用手持手机的立法以及不同人群亚组的驾驶员行为观察
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4373-x.
2
The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.年龄对与驾驶员分神相关的碰撞风险的影响。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):258-265. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw234.
3
The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States.美国禁止使用手持电话与年轻驾驶员手持电话通话普及率之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):833-837.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Safer Roads Owing to Higher Gasoline Prices: How Long It Takes.汽油价格上涨带来更安全的道路:所需时长。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e119-25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302579. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
State all-driver distracted driving laws and high school students'  texting while driving behavior.阐述所有关于驾驶员分心驾驶的法律以及高中生的边开车边发短信行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):5-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1041112. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
6
The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
7
Impact of texting laws on motor vehicular fatalities in the United States.美国 texting 法规对机动车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1370-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301894. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
The effectiveness of a 0.05 blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving in the United States.美国血液酒精浓度(BAC)0.05的驾驶限制的有效性。
Addiction. 2014 Jun;109(6):869-74. doi: 10.1111/add.12365. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.驾驶表现与从事次要任务之间的关联:系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):e39-48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
10
Cellphone bans and fatal motor vehicle crash rates in the United States.美国的手机禁令与致命机动车碰撞事故率。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 May;34(2):197-212. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.3. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

16 个美国州的驾车时发短信禁令与机动车事故相关的急诊就诊情况:2007-2014 年。

Texting-While-Driving Bans and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Emergency Department Visits in 16 US States: 2007-2014.

机构信息

At the time of this study, all authors were with the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Texas A&M University School of Public Health, College Station.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):748-754. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304999. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2019.304999
PMID:30896993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459634/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of state texting bans on motor vehicle crash (MVC)-related emergency department (ED) visits.

METHODS

We used ED data from 16 US states between 2007 and 2014. We employed a difference-in-difference approach and conditional Poisson regressions to estimate changes in counts of MVC-related ED visits in states with and without texting bans. We also constructed age cohorts to explore whether texting bans have differential impacts by age group.

RESULTS

On average, states with a texting ban saw a 4% reduction in MVC-related ED visits (incidence rate ratio = 0.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.96, 0.97). This equates to an average of 1632 traffic-related ED visits prevented per year in states with a ban. Both primary and secondary bans were associated with significant reductions in MVC-related visits to the ED regardless of whether they were on all drivers or young drivers only. Individuals aged 64 years and younger in states with a texting ban saw significantly fewer MVC-related ED visits following its implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that states' efforts to curb distracted driving through texting bans and decrease its negative consequences are associated with significant decreases in the incidence of ED visits that follow an MVC.

摘要

目的

考察州 texting 禁令对机动车事故(MVC)相关急诊就诊的影响。

方法

我们使用了 2007 年至 2014 年 16 个美国州的急诊数据。我们采用差分法和条件泊松回归,估计了有无 texting 禁令的州 MVC 相关急诊就诊次数的变化。我们还构建了年龄队列,以探讨 texting 禁令是否对不同年龄组有不同的影响。

结果

平均而言,有 texting 禁令的州 MVC 相关急诊就诊减少了 4%(发病率比=0.96;95%置信区间=0.96,0.97)。这意味着在实施禁令的州,每年可预防平均 1632 次与交通相关的急诊就诊。无论是针对所有司机还是年轻司机,初级和二级禁令都与 MVC 相关急诊就诊的显著减少相关。在实施 texting 禁令的州,年龄在 64 岁及以下的个体在其实施后,MVC 相关急诊就诊次数明显减少。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,各州通过 texting 禁令遏制分心驾驶及其负面影响的努力与 ED 就诊人数的显著减少相关,而这些 ED 就诊是 MVC 后的结果。