• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of multilevel modeling to examine variability of distracted driving behavior in naturalistic driving studies.利用多层次模型研究自然驾驶研究中分心驾驶行为的可变性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105986. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105986. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Creation of the Naturalistic Engagement in Secondary Tasks (NEST) distracted driving dataset.创建次要任务自然参与(NEST)分心驾驶数据集。
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
3
Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.考察分心驾驶时驾驶员的眼动模式:来自扫视随机性和眼跳转换矩阵的洞察。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Investigating the impact of driving automation systems on distracted driving behaviors.研究驾驶自动化系统对分心驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106152. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Assessing the relationship between self-reported driving behaviors and driver risk using a naturalistic driving study.使用自然驾驶研究评估自我报告的驾驶行为与驾驶员风险之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
Distracted driver behaviors and distracting conditions among adolescent drivers: findings from a naturalistic driving study.青少年驾驶员的分心驾驶行为和分心条件:自然驾驶研究的结果。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5 Suppl):S50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.01.005.
7
Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.利用自然驾驶研究数据,研究跟车行驶情况下高速公路追尾事故中驾驶员分心对驾驶员制动反应时间的影响。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
8
Driver distraction by digital billboards? Structural equation modeling based on naturalistic driving study data: A case study of Iran.数字化广告牌对驾驶员的干扰?基于自然驾驶研究数据的结构方程建模:以伊朗为例的一项案例研究。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
9
The Impact of driver distraction and secondary tasks with and without other co-occurring driving behaviors on the level of road traffic crashes.驾驶分心和伴随其他驾驶行为的次要任务对道路交通碰撞水平的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Apr;153:106010. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106010. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuropsychological Correlates of Changes in Driving Behavior Among Clinically Healthy Older Adults.临床健康老年人驾驶行为变化的神经心理学相关性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Oct 6;77(10):1769-1778. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbac101.
2
Yellow light decision based on driving style: Day or night?基于驾驶风格的黄灯决策:白天还是夜晚?
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265267. eCollection 2022.
3
Re-Thinking the Mediating Role of Emotional Valence and Arousal between Personal Factors and Occupational Safety Attention Levels.重新思考个人因素与职业安全关注水平之间的情绪效价和唤醒的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 21;18(11):5511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115511.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between emotional symptoms and self-reported aberrant driving behaviors in older adults.老年人情绪症状与自我报告异常驾驶行为之间的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jun;127:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
2
Using naturalistic driving data to better understand the driving exposure and patterns of older drivers.利用自然驾驶数据更好地了解老年驾驶员的驾驶暴露情况和模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S83-S88. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1379601.
3
Sleep deficiency and motor vehicle crash risk in the general population: a prospective cohort study.睡眠不足与普通人群机动车事故风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2018 Mar 20;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1025-7.
4
Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.使用SHRP 2自然驾驶数据评估驾驶员在进行不同次要任务时的速度选择。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 6.
5
Longitudinal Research on Aging Drivers (LongROAD): study design and methods.老年驾驶员纵向研究(LongROAD):研究设计与方法
Inj Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;4(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40621-017-0121-z. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Visual Sensory and Visual-Cognitive Function and Rate of Crash and Near-Crash Involvement Among Older Drivers Using Naturalistic Driving Data.利用自然驾驶数据评估老年驾驶员的视觉感官和视觉认知功能与撞车及险些撞车发生率的关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):2959-2967. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-21482.
7
Driver behaviour profiles for road safety analysis.用于道路安全分析的驾驶员行为概况
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Mar;76:118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Cognitive functioning differentially predicts different dimensions of older drivers' on-road safety.认知功能对老年驾驶员道路安全的不同维度具有不同的预测作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
9
Variability in self-reported normal sleep across the adult age span.成年期自我报告的正常睡眠的变异性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):46-56. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu035. Epub 2014 May 13.
10
Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.驾驶表现与从事次要任务之间的关联:系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):e39-48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

利用多层次模型研究自然驾驶研究中分心驾驶行为的可变性。

Use of multilevel modeling to examine variability of distracted driving behavior in naturalistic driving studies.

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University, 119 Health and Human Development Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States.

Clemson University, 418 Brackett Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105986. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105986. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105986
PMID:33517207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8204745/
Abstract

Current methods of analyzing data from naturalistic driving studies provide important insights into real-world safety-related driving behaviors, but are limited in the depth of information they currently offer. Driving measures are frequently collapsed to summary levels across the study period, excluding more fine-grained differences such as changes that occur from trip to trip. By retaining trip-specific data, it is possible to quantify how much a driver differs from trip to trip (within-person variability) in addition to how he or she differs from other drivers (between-person variability). To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to use multilevel modeling to quantify variability in distracted driving behavior in a naturalistic dataset of older drivers. The current study demonstrates the utility of examining within-person variability in a naturalistic driving dataset of 68 older drivers across two weeks. First, multilevel models were conducted for three distracted driving behaviors to distinguish within-person variability from between-person variability in these behaviors. A high percentage of variation in distracted driving behaviors was attributable to within-person differences, indicating that drivers' behaviors varied more across their own driving trips than from other drivers (ICCs = .93). Then, to demonstrate the utility of personal characteristics in predicting daily driving behavior, a hypothetical model is presented using simulated daily sleep duration from the previous night to predict distracted driving behavior the following day. The current study demonstrates substantial variability in driving behaviors within an older adult sample and the promise of individual characteristics to provide better prediction of driving behaviors relevant to safety, which can be applied in investigations of current naturalistic driving datasets and in designing future studies.

摘要

目前分析自然驾驶研究数据的方法为深入了解与安全相关的实际驾驶行为提供了重要的见解,但这些方法在提供信息的深度上存在局限性。在研究期间,驾驶措施通常会被汇总到摘要水平,排除了更细微的差异,例如从一次行程到另一次行程的变化。通过保留特定行程的数据,可以量化驾驶员在每次行程中的差异(个体内变异性),以及他或她与其他驾驶员的差异(个体间变异性)。据作者所知,目前的研究首次使用多层次模型来量化自然驾驶数据集中年长驾驶员分心驾驶行为的变异性。目前的研究在两周内对 68 名年长驾驶员的自然驾驶数据集进行了个体内变异性分析,证明了其在自然驾驶数据集分析中的有效性。首先,对三种分心驾驶行为进行了多层次模型分析,以区分这些行为中的个体内变异性和个体间变异性。分心驾驶行为的很大一部分变化归因于个体内差异,这表明驾驶员的行为在自己的驾驶行程中变化更大,而不是与其他驾驶员的行为变化更大(ICC =.93)。然后,为了展示个人特征在预测日常驾驶行为方面的有效性,使用前一天晚上的模拟每日睡眠时间来预测第二天的分心驾驶行为,提出了一个假设模型。目前的研究表明,在年长成年样本中存在大量的驾驶行为变异性,并且个人特征有希望提供更好的安全相关驾驶行为预测,这可以应用于当前自然驾驶数据集的研究和未来研究的设计。