• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。

The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.

作者信息

Ferdinand Alva O, Menachemi Nir, Blackburn Justin L, Sen Bisakha, Nelson Leonard, Morrisey Michael

机构信息

At the time of this study, Alva O. Ferdinand and Michael Morrisey were with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Public Health, College Station, TX. Nir Menachemi, Justin L. Blackburn, Bisakha Sen, and Leonard Nelson were with the Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama, Birmingham.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537
PMID:25790409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4386499/
Abstract

We used a panel design and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 19 states between 2003 and 2010 to examine the impact of texting bans on crash-related hospitalizations. We conducted conditional negative binomial regressions with state, year, and month fixed effects to examine changes in crash-related hospitalizations in states after the enactment of a texting ban relative to those in states without such bans. Results indicate that texting bans were associated with a 7% reduction in crash-related hospitalizations among all age groups. Texting bans were significantly associated with reductions in hospitalizations among those aged 22 to 64 years and those aged 65 years or older. Marginal reductions were seen among adolescents. States that have not passed strict texting bans should consider doing so.

摘要

我们采用面板设计,并利用2003年至2010年间来自19个州的全国住院患者样本,来研究短信禁令对与车祸相关的住院情况的影响。我们进行了带有州、年份和月份固定效应的条件负二项回归,以检验在实施短信禁令后,有禁令的州与没有此类禁令的州相比,与车祸相关的住院情况的变化。结果表明,短信禁令使所有年龄组中与车祸相关的住院人数减少了7%。短信禁令与22至64岁人群以及65岁及以上人群的住院人数减少显著相关。青少年中的住院人数有少量减少。尚未通过严格短信禁令的州应考虑这样做。

相似文献

1
The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
2
Texting-While-Driving Bans and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Emergency Department Visits in 16 US States: 2007-2014.16 个美国州的驾车时发短信禁令与机动车事故相关的急诊就诊情况:2007-2014 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):748-754. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304999. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students.美国各州短信使用规定与美国高中生边开车边发短信的普遍程度之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Impact of texting laws on motor vehicular fatalities in the United States.美国 texting 法规对机动车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1370-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301894. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
Distracted Driving Laws and Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities.分心驾驶法规与机动车事故死亡人数
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3621. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.日常使用手机和开车时使用手机与驾驶员层面碰撞风险的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Texting while driving: does the new law work among healthcare providers?开车时发短信:新法律在医疗保健人员中是否有效?
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;15(5):604-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.4.21273. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
8
Bans on Cellphone Use While Driving and Traffic Fatalities in the United States.美国的开车时禁止使用手机和交通死亡人数。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001391.
9
Watch for motorcycles! The effects of texting and handheld bans on motorcyclist fatalities.注意摩托车!禁止发短信和手持设备对摩托车手死亡的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Nov;216:81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
10
State all-driver distracted driving laws and high school students'  texting while driving behavior.阐述所有关于驾驶员分心驾驶的法律以及高中生的边开车边发短信行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(1):5-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1041112. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of using administrative healthcare data to identify risk of motor vehicle crash-related injury: the importance of distinguishing crash from crash-related injury.利用行政医疗保健数据识别机动车碰撞相关损伤风险的意义:区分碰撞与碰撞相关损伤的重要性。
Inj Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 12;11(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00523-3.
2
Major Traffic Safety Reform and Road Traffic Injuries Among Low-Income New York Residents, 2009-2021.2009-2021 年,重大交通安全改革与纽约低收入居民道路交通伤害。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jun;114(6):633-641. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307617.
3
Cortical and subcortical response to the anticipation of reward in high and average/low risk-taking adolescents.青少年高风险和中低风险决策时对预期奖励的皮质和皮质下反应。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Aug;44:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100798. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
A Behavioral Economic Analysis of Demand for Texting while Driving.驾车时发短信需求的行为经济学分析
Psychol Rec. 2019 Jun;69(2):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s40732-019-00341-w. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
Texting-While-Driving Bans and Motor Vehicle Crash-Related Emergency Department Visits in 16 US States: 2007-2014.16 个美国州的驾车时发短信禁令与机动车事故相关的急诊就诊情况:2007-2014 年。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):748-754. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304999. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Adolescents' perspectives on distracted driving legislation.青少年对分心驾驶立法的看法。
J Safety Res. 2019 Feb;68:173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.013. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
7
Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach.威胁呼吁减少与驾车时发短信相关的冲动决策:一种行为经济学方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213453. eCollection 2019.
8
Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities: differences in population subgroups and location.驾驶时使用手机的法律和机动车驾驶员死亡人数:人口亚组和地点的差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
The roles of delay and probability discounting in texting while driving: Toward the development of a translational scientific program.驾驶时发短信中延迟和概率折扣的作用:迈向一个转化科学项目的发展。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 Sep;110(2):229-242. doi: 10.1002/jeab.460. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
10
Heads Up, Phones Down: A Pedestrian Safety Intervention on Distracted Crosswalk Behavior.抬头,手机放低:减少行人分心过路口行为的干预措施。
J Community Health. 2018 Aug;43(4):810-815. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0488-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of texting laws on motor vehicular fatalities in the United States.美国 texting 法规对机动车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1370-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301894. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
2
Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.驾驶表现与从事次要任务之间的关联:系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):e39-48. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301750. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
3
Impact of a graduated driver's license law on crashes involving young drivers in New York State.《纽约州分级驾照法对涉及年轻驾驶员的事故的影响》
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):457-61. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825880f3.
4
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
5
Identification of hospitalizations for intentional self-harm when E-codes are incompletely recorded.当 E 编码未完整记录时,识别故意自我伤害的住院情况。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Dec;19(12):1263-75. doi: 10.1002/pds.2037. Epub 2010 Oct 3.
6
Incidence and total lifetime costs of motor vehicle-related fatal and nonfatal injury by road user type, United States, 2005.2005 年美国按道路使用者类型划分的与机动车相关的致命和非致命伤害的发生率和终生总成本。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Aug;11(4):353-60. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2010.486429.
7
The impact of a standard enforcement safety belt law on fatalities and hospital charges in Ohio.俄亥俄州标准执行安全带法对死亡人数和医院费用的影响。
J Safety Res. 2010 Feb;41(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
8
Motor vehicle injury, mortality, and hospital charges by strength of graduated driver licensing laws in 36 States.36个州分级驾驶员执照法律力度与机动车伤害、死亡率及医院收费情况
J Trauma. 2009 Jul;67(1 Suppl):S43-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181937f4f.
9
The effects of mandatory seatbelt laws on seatbelt use, motor vehicle fatalities, and crash-related injuries among youths.强制使用安全带法律对青少年安全带使用情况、机动车死亡率及与撞车相关伤害的影响。
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):642-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.010. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
10
Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003.2003年美国创伤性脑损伤的发病率
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):544-8. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00009.