• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检验理论:家庭环境、照护者动机和家庭检查模型中的冲突。

Putting theory to the test: examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the Family Check-Up model.

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University.

University of Oregon.

出版信息

Dev Psychopathol. 2014 May;26(2):305-18. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413001004. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1017/S0954579413001004
PMID:24438894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4078925/
Abstract

This study examined contextual factors (caregiver depression, family resources, ethnicity, and initial levels of youth problem behavior) related to the effectiveness of the Family Check-Up (FCU) and evaluated family processes as a mediator of FCU intervention response and adolescent antisocial behavior. We followed a sample of 180 ethnically diverse youths of families who engaged in the FCU intervention. Family data were collected as part of the FCU assessment, and youth data were collected over 4 years, from sixth through ninth grade. Findings indicated that caregiver depression and minority status predicted greater caregiver motivation to change. In turn, caregiver motivation was the only direct predictor of FCU intervention response during a 1-year period. Growth in family conflict from sixth through eighth grade mediated the link between FCU response and ninth-grade antisocial behavior. This study explicitly tested core aspects of the FCU intervention model and demonstrated that caregiver motivation is a central factor that underlies family response to the FCU. The study also provided support for continued examination of family process mechanisms that account for enduring effects of the FCU and other family-centered interventions.

摘要

本研究考察了与家庭检查(FCU)有效性相关的背景因素(照顾者抑郁、家庭资源、种族和青少年问题行为的初始水平),并评估了家庭过程作为 FCU 干预反应和青少年反社会行为的中介。我们跟踪了一个由 180 名不同种族的青少年及其家庭组成的样本,这些家庭参与了 FCU 干预。家庭数据是作为 FCU 评估的一部分收集的,而青少年数据则在 4 年内收集,从六年级到九年级。研究结果表明,照顾者抑郁和少数民族身份预测了照顾者改变的更大动力。反过来,照顾者的动机是 FCU 干预反应的唯一直接预测因素,在为期一年的时间内。从六年级到八年级的家庭冲突增长中介了 FCU 反应与九年级反社会行为之间的联系。本研究明确测试了 FCU 干预模型的核心方面,并表明照顾者的动机是家庭对 FCU 反应的核心因素。该研究还为进一步研究家庭过程机制提供了支持,这些机制解释了 FCU 和其他以家庭为中心的干预措施的持久效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/b1d2fd8658b8/nihms585043f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/d7338a9ce257/nihms585043f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/48299c0fa7e5/nihms585043f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/da989dadcec5/nihms585043f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/04f4a919b16e/nihms585043f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/b1d2fd8658b8/nihms585043f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/d7338a9ce257/nihms585043f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/48299c0fa7e5/nihms585043f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/da989dadcec5/nihms585043f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/04f4a919b16e/nihms585043f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ef2/4078925/b1d2fd8658b8/nihms585043f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Putting theory to the test: examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the Family Check-Up model.检验理论:家庭环境、照护者动机和家庭检查模型中的冲突。
Dev Psychopathol. 2014 May;26(2):305-18. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413001004. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
2
Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition.让家长参与中学时期的家庭体检:通过高中过渡对家庭冲突和问题行为的纵向影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Jun;50(6):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Preventing adolescent depression with the family check-up: Examining family conflict as a mechanism of change.通过家庭检查预防青少年抑郁症:将家庭冲突作为一种改变机制进行研究。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Feb;30(1):82-92. doi: 10.1037/fam0000147. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Family check-up effects across diverse ethnic groups: reducing early-adolescence antisocial behavior by reducing family conflict.不同族裔群体中的家庭检查效果:通过减少家庭冲突来减少青少年早期的反社会行为。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2014;43(3):400-14. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.888670. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
5
Direct and indirect effects of a family-based intervention in early adolescence on parent-youth relationship quality, late adolescent health, and early adult obesity.家庭为基础的早期干预对青少年父母与子女关系质量、青少年后期健康和成年早期肥胖的直接和间接影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Feb;27(1):106-16. doi: 10.1037/a0031428.
6
The impact of a family-centered intervention on the ecology of adolescent antisocial behavior: modeling developmental sequelae and trajectories during adolescence.家庭为中心的干预对青少年反社会行为生态的影响:青少年期发展后果和轨迹的建模。
Dev Psychopathol. 2012 Aug;24(3):1139-55. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000582.
7
Evaluating the efficacy of the Family Check-Up Online: A school-based, eHealth model for the prevention of problem behavior during the middle school years.评估家庭检查在线的效果:一种基于学校的、电子健康模式,用于预防中学阶段的问题行为。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1873-1886. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000907.
8
Opening the "Black Box": family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use.打开“黑箱”:家庭检查干预对自我调节的影响,防止问题行为和物质使用的增长。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Aug;51(4):455-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent-child interactions: the intervening role of caregivers' relational schemas.视频反馈对早期强制性亲子互动的影响:照顾者关系图式的中介作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(3):405-17. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.777917. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Preventing high-risk sexual behavior in early adulthood with family interventions in adolescence: outcomes and developmental processes.青少年期家庭干预预防成年早期高危性行为:结果与发展过程。
Prev Sci. 2014 Feb;15 Suppl 1(0 1):S59-69. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0383-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Family Check-Up Online: Effects of a Virtual Randomized Trial on Parent Stress, Parenting, and Child Outcomes in Early Adolescence.在线家庭检查:虚拟随机试验对青少年早期父母压力、育儿方式和儿童结局的影响。
Prev Sci. 2024 Sep 24. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01725-3.
2
A machine learning approach to improve implementation monitoring of family-based preventive interventions in primary care.一种用于改善基层医疗中基于家庭的预防性干预措施实施监测的机器学习方法。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 25;4:26334895231187906. doi: 10.1177/26334895231187906. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Coercive Parent-Adolescent Interactions Predict Substance use and Antisocial Behaviors Through Early Adulthood: A Dynamic Systems Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of a family-centered intervention on the ecology of adolescent antisocial behavior: modeling developmental sequelae and trajectories during adolescence.家庭为中心的干预对青少年反社会行为生态的影响:青少年期发展后果和轨迹的建模。
Dev Psychopathol. 2012 Aug;24(3):1139-55. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000582.
2
Family Check Up effects on adolescent arrest trajectories: Variation by developmental subtype.家庭体检对青少年逮捕轨迹的影响:发育亚型的差异
J Res Adolesc. 2012 Jun 1;22(2):367-380. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00765.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
3
A six-year predictive test of adolescent family relationship quality and effortful control pathways to emerging adult social and emotional health.
强制性的亲子互动通过动态系统视角预测青少年时期至成年早期的物质使用和反社会行为。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Jan;52(1):141-154. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01102-8. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Interparental conflict, family climate, and threat appraisals: Early adolescent exposure and young adult psychopathology risk.父母冲突、家庭氛围与威胁评估:青少年早期的暴露与青年期精神病理风险
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Aug;37(5):731-742. doi: 10.1037/fam0001096. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Barriers and facilitators in the delivery of a proportionate universal parenting program model (E-SEE Steps) in community family services.在社区家庭服务中实施比例公平型普遍育儿方案模式(E-SEE 步骤)的障碍和促进因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 13;17(6):e0265946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265946. eCollection 2022.
6
Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of behavioral outcomes in a relationally focused, family-centered telehealth intervention.关系为中心、家庭为中心的远程医疗干预中治疗联盟是行为结果的预测指标。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2021 Apr;47(2):473-484. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12517. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
When do adolescents feel loved? A daily within-person study of parent-adolescent relations.青少年何时感到被爱?一项关于亲子关系的每日个体内研究。
Emotion. 2022 Aug;22(5):861-873. doi: 10.1037/emo0000767. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Motivational Interviewing and Caregiver Engagement in the Family Check-Up 4 Health.动机式晤谈与照顾者在家庭体检 4 健康中的参与
Prev Sci. 2021 Aug;22(6):737-746. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01112-8.
9
Factors related to parental pre-treatment motivation in outpatient child and adolescent mental health care.门诊儿童和青少年心理健康护理中与父母治疗前动机相关的因素。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;29(7):947-958. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01391-9. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
10
Potential Mediators in Parenting and Family Intervention: Quality of Mediation Analyses.育儿与家庭干预中的潜在调节变量:调节分析的质量
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;20(2):127-145. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0221-2.
青少年家庭关系质量的六年预测性测试及努力控制对成年早期社会和情感健康的影响途径。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Aug;26(4):565-75. doi: 10.1037/a0028873. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition.让家长参与中学时期的家庭体检:通过高中过渡对家庭冲突和问题行为的纵向影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Jun;50(6):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
5
Family relationships and parental monitoring during middle school as predictors of early adolescent problem behavior.家庭关系和父母监督在中学阶段对青少年早期问题行为的预测作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012;41(2):202-13. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.651989.
6
Culturally adapted mental health intervention: A meta-analytic review.文化适应的心理健康干预:元分析综述。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2006 Winter;43(4):531-48. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.43.4.531.
7
Treatment outcomes and mediators of parent management training: a one-year follow-up of children with conduct problems.父母管理训练的治疗效果和中介因素:对有行为问题儿童的一年随访。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(2):165-78. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.546050.
8
An ecological approach to promoting early adolescent mental health and social adaptation: family-centered intervention in public middle schools.促进青少年早期心理健康和社会适应的生态方法:公立中学的以家庭为中心的干预。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):209-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01551.x.
9
Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes.预防项目对促进有效育儿的长期影响:持久效果但不确定过程。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:299-329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619.
10
Who benefits and how does it work? Moderators and mediators of outcome in an effectiveness trial of a parenting intervention.谁受益,它是如何起作用的?育儿干预效果试验中的结局的调节变量和中介变量。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;39(4):568-80. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2010.486315.