Farid M, Vaughan R, Thomas S
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1BB, UK.
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Chancellor Drive, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Plast Surg Int. 2017;2017:9458741. doi: 10.1155/2017/9458741. Epub 2017 May 23.
The undergraduate medical curriculum has been overcrowded with core learning outcomes with no formal exposure to plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare medical students from two educational settings for the basic understanding, preferred learning method, and factors influencing a career choice in plastic surgery.
A prospective cohort study based on a web-based anonymous questionnaire sent to final year medical students at Birmingham University (United Kingdom), McGill University (Canada), and a control group (non-medical staff). The questions were about plastic surgery: (1) source of information and basic understanding; (2) undergraduate curriculum inclusion and preferred learning methods; (3) factors influencing a career choice. A similar questionnaire was sent to non-medical staff (control group). The data was analysed based on categorical outcomes (Chi-square 2) and level of significance ≤ 0.05.
Questionnaire was analysed for 243 students (Birmingham, = 171/332, 52%) (McGill = 72/132, 54%). Birmingham students (14%) considered the word "plastic" synonymous with "cosmetic" more than McGill students (4%, < 0.025). Teaching was the main source of knowledge for McGill students (39%, < 0.001) while Birmingham students and control group chose the media (70%, < 0.001). McGill students (67%) more than Birmingham (49%, < 0.010) considered curriculum inclusion. The preferred learning method was lectures for McGill students (61%, < 0.01) but an optional module for Birmingham (61%). A similar proportion (18%) from both student groups considered a career in plastic surgery.
Medical students recognised the need for plastic surgery inclusion in the undergraduate curriculum. There was a difference for plastic surgery source of information, operations, and preferred method of learning for students. The study highlighted the urgent need to reform plastic surgery undergraduate teaching in collaboration with national educational bodies worldwide.
本科医学课程中充斥着核心学习成果,却没有正式接触整形手术的内容。本研究的目的是比较来自两种教育背景的医学生对整形手术的基本理解、偏好的学习方法以及影响整形手术职业选择的因素。
一项前瞻性队列研究,通过基于网络的匿名问卷对英国伯明翰大学、加拿大麦吉尔大学的最后一年医学生以及一个对照组(非医务人员)进行调查。问题涉及整形手术:(1)信息来源和基本理解;(2)本科课程设置及偏好的学习方法;(3)影响职业选择的因素。向非医务人员(对照组)发送了类似的问卷。数据基于分类结果(卡方检验2)进行分析,显著性水平≤0.05。
对243名学生的问卷进行了分析(伯明翰大学,n = 171/332,52%)(麦吉尔大学,n = 72/132,54%)。伯明翰大学的学生(14%)比麦吉尔大学的学生(4%,P < 0.025)更倾向于认为“整形”一词与“美容”同义。教学是麦吉尔大学学生(39%,P < 0.001)知识的主要来源,而伯明翰大学的学生和对照组则选择媒体(70%,P < 0.001)。麦吉尔大学的学生(67%)比伯明翰大学的学生(49%,P < 0.010)更倾向于认为课程应包含整形手术内容。麦吉尔大学学生偏好的学习方法是讲座(61%,P < 0.01),而伯明翰大学学生则偏好选修模块(61%)。两个学生群体中都有相似比例(18%)的人考虑从事整形手术职业。
医学生认识到本科课程中需要纳入整形手术内容。学生在整形手术信息来源、手术内容以及偏好的学习方法方面存在差异。该研究强调了与全球国家教育机构合作,迫切需要改革整形手术本科教学。