Brown Samuel M, Aboumatar Hanan J, Francis Leslie, Halamka John, Rozenblum Ronen, Rubin Eileen, Sarnoff Lee Barbara, Sugarman Jeremy, Turner Kathleen, Vorwaller Micah, Frosch Dominick L
Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 S. Cottonwood St, Murray, UT USA and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv182. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may lack decisional capacity and may depend on proxy decision makers (PDMs) to make medical decisions on their behalf. High-quality information-sharing with PDMs, including through such means as health information technology, could improve communication and decision making and could potentially minimize the psychological consequences of an ICU stay for both patients and their family members. However, alongside these anticipated benefits of information-sharing are risks of unwanted disclosure of sensitive information. Approaches to identifying the optimal balance between access to digital health information to facilitate engagement and protecting patient privacy are urgently needed. We identified eight themes that should be considered in balancing health information access and patient privacy: 1) potential benefits to patients from PDM data access; 2) potential harms to patients from such access; 3) the moral status of families within the patient-clinician relationship; 4) the scope of relevant information provided to PDMs; 5) issues around defining PDMs' authority; 6) methods for eliciting and documenting patient preferences about their family's information access; 7) the relevance of methods for ascertaining the identity of PDMs; and 8) the obligations of hospitals to prevent privacy breaches by PDMs. We conclude that PDMs should typically have access to health information from the current episode of care when the patient is decisionally impaired, unless the patient has previously expressed a clear preference that PDMs not have such access.
重症监护病房(ICU)的患者可能缺乏决策能力,可能需要委托代理人(PDM)代表他们做出医疗决策。与PDM进行高质量的信息共享,包括通过健康信息技术等手段,可改善沟通和决策,并有可能将ICU住院对患者及其家属造成的心理影响降至最低。然而,在信息共享带来这些预期益处的同时,也存在敏感信息被不当披露的风险。迫切需要找到方法,在获取数字健康信息以促进参与和保护患者隐私之间找到最佳平衡。我们确定了在平衡健康信息获取和患者隐私时应考虑的八个主题:1)PDM获取数据对患者的潜在益处;2)此类获取对患者的潜在危害;3)家庭在患者-临床医生关系中的道德地位;4)提供给PDM的相关信息范围;5)围绕定义PDM权限的问题;6)引出并记录患者对其家人获取信息的偏好的方法;7)确定PDM身份的方法的相关性;8)医院防止PDM侵犯隐私的义务。我们得出结论,当患者决策能力受损时,PDM通常应能够获取当前治疗期间的健康信息,除非患者此前已明确表示偏好不让PDM获取此类信息。