Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房让家属参与时平衡数字信息共享与患者隐私。

Balancing digital information-sharing and patient privacy when engaging families in the intensive care unit.

作者信息

Brown Samuel M, Aboumatar Hanan J, Francis Leslie, Halamka John, Rozenblum Ronen, Rubin Eileen, Sarnoff Lee Barbara, Sugarman Jeremy, Turner Kathleen, Vorwaller Micah, Frosch Dominick L

机构信息

Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 S. Cottonwood St, Murray, UT USA and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv182. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Abstract

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may lack decisional capacity and may depend on proxy decision makers (PDMs) to make medical decisions on their behalf. High-quality information-sharing with PDMs, including through such means as health information technology, could improve communication and decision making and could potentially minimize the psychological consequences of an ICU stay for both patients and their family members. However, alongside these anticipated benefits of information-sharing are risks of unwanted disclosure of sensitive information. Approaches to identifying the optimal balance between access to digital health information to facilitate engagement and protecting patient privacy are urgently needed. We identified eight themes that should be considered in balancing health information access and patient privacy: 1) potential benefits to patients from PDM data access; 2) potential harms to patients from such access; 3) the moral status of families within the patient-clinician relationship; 4) the scope of relevant information provided to PDMs; 5) issues around defining PDMs' authority; 6) methods for eliciting and documenting patient preferences about their family's information access; 7) the relevance of methods for ascertaining the identity of PDMs; and 8) the obligations of hospitals to prevent privacy breaches by PDMs. We conclude that PDMs should typically have access to health information from the current episode of care when the patient is decisionally impaired, unless the patient has previously expressed a clear preference that PDMs not have such access.

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)的患者可能缺乏决策能力,可能需要委托代理人(PDM)代表他们做出医疗决策。与PDM进行高质量的信息共享,包括通过健康信息技术等手段,可改善沟通和决策,并有可能将ICU住院对患者及其家属造成的心理影响降至最低。然而,在信息共享带来这些预期益处的同时,也存在敏感信息被不当披露的风险。迫切需要找到方法,在获取数字健康信息以促进参与和保护患者隐私之间找到最佳平衡。我们确定了在平衡健康信息获取和患者隐私时应考虑的八个主题:1)PDM获取数据对患者的潜在益处;2)此类获取对患者的潜在危害;3)家庭在患者-临床医生关系中的道德地位;4)提供给PDM的相关信息范围;5)围绕定义PDM权限的问题;6)引出并记录患者对其家人获取信息的偏好的方法;7)确定PDM身份的方法的相关性;8)医院防止PDM侵犯隐私的义务。我们得出结论,当患者决策能力受损时,PDM通常应能够获取当前治疗期间的健康信息,除非患者此前已明确表示偏好不让PDM获取此类信息。

相似文献

4
Information Sharing Preferences of Older Patients and Their Families.老年患者及其家属的信息共享偏好。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1492-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2903.
8
A Clinician's Guide to Privacy and Communication in the ICU.重症监护病房隐私与沟通临床指南
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):480-485. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002190.

本文引用的文献

5
Defining patient and family engagement in the intensive care unit.界定重症监护病房中患者及家属的参与度。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 1;191(3):358-60. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1936LE.
7
The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*.美国慢性危重病的流行病学*
Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):282-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000710.
10
Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity.慢性病患者的个人健康记录:一个重大机遇。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Apr 23;5(2):416-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验