Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Heart. 2014 Jun;100(12):960-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304673. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Although the presence of an RV lead is a potential cause of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the clinical impact of significant lead-induced TR is unknown.
To evaluate the effect of significant lead-induced TR on cardiac performance and long-term outcome after cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation.
A retrospective cohort of 239 ICD (n=191) or pacemaker (n=48) recipients (age 60±14 years, 77% male) from a tertiary care university hospital, with an echocardiographic evaluation before and within 1-1.5 years after device implantation were included. Significant lead-induced TR was defined as TR worsening, reaching a grade ≥2 at follow-up echocardiography. During long-term follow-up (median 58, IQR 35-76 months), all-cause mortality and heart failure related events were recorded.
Before device implantation, most patients had TR grade 1 or 2 (64.0%) or no TR (33.9%), but after lead placement, significant TR was seen in 91 patients (38%). Changes in cardiac volumes and function at follow-up were similar between patients with and without significant lead-induced TR, except for larger RV diastolic area (17±6mm(2) vs 16±5mm(2), p=0.009), larger right atrial diameter (39±10 mm vs 36±8 mm, p<0.001) and higher pulmonary arterial pressures (41±15 mm Hg vs 33±10 mm Hg, p<0.001) in patients with significant lead-induced TR. Patients with significant lead-induced TR had worse long-term survival (HR=1.687, p=0.040) and/or more heart failure related events (HR=1.641, p=0.019). At multivariate analysis, significant lead-induced TR was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR=1.749, p=0.047) together with age, LVEF and percentage RV pacing.
Significant lead-induced TR is associated with poor long-term prognosis.
尽管 RV 导联的存在是三尖瓣反流(TR)的潜在原因,但严重的导联引起的 TR 的临床影响尚不清楚。
评估在植入心脏转复除颤器(ICD)或起搏器后,严重导联引起的 TR 对心脏功能和长期预后的影响。
回顾性纳入了来自一家三级护理大学医院的 239 例 ICD(n=191)或起搏器(n=48)接受者的队列,这些患者在器械植入前和植入后 1-1.5 年内进行了超声心动图评估。严重的导联引起的 TR 定义为 TR 恶化,在随访超声心动图中达到≥2 级。在长期随访期间(中位数 58,IQR 35-76 个月),记录了全因死亡率和心力衰竭相关事件。
在器械植入前,大多数患者的 TR 分级为 1 级或 2 级(64.0%)或无 TR(33.9%),但在导联放置后,91 例患者出现了严重的 TR(38%)。在有和无严重导联引起的 TR 的患者中,随访时的心脏容积和功能的变化相似,除了 RV 舒张末期面积更大(17±6mm² vs 16±5mm²,p=0.009)、右心房直径更大(39±10mm vs 36±8mm,p<0.001)和肺动脉压更高(41±15mmHg vs 33±10mmHg,p<0.001)。有严重导联引起的 TR 的患者长期生存率更差(HR=1.687,p=0.040)和/或有更多心力衰竭相关事件(HR=1.641,p=0.019)。在多变量分析中,严重的导联引起的 TR 与全因死亡率独立相关(HR=1.749,p=0.047),同时还与年龄、LVEF 和 RV 起搏百分比相关。
严重的导联引起的 TR 与不良的长期预后相关。