Suppr超能文献

面孔加工中的知觉和注视偏向:相关还是不相关?

Perceptual and gaze biases during face processing: related or not?

机构信息

Laboratoire Vision Action Cognition (Institut de Psychologie, Institut Universitaire Paris Descartes de Psychologie & INC), Université Paris Descartes & Sorbonne Paris Cité, Boulogne Billancourt, France.

Laboratoire Vision Action Cognition (Institut de Psychologie, Institut Universitaire Paris Descartes de Psychologie & INC), Université Paris Descartes & Sorbonne Paris Cité, Boulogne Billancourt, France ; Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e85746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085746. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a left perceptual bias while looking at faces, due to the fact that observers mainly use information from the left side of a face (from the observer's point of view) to perform a judgment task. Such a bias is consistent with the right hemisphere dominance for face processing and has sometimes been linked to a left gaze bias, i.e. more and/or longer fixations on the left side of the face. Here, we recorded eye-movements, in two different experiments during a gender judgment task, using normal and chimeric faces which were presented above, below, right or left to the central fixation point or on it (central position). Participants performed the judgment task by remaining fixated on the fixation point or after executing several saccades (up to three). A left perceptual bias was not systematically found as it depended on the number of allowed saccades and face position. Moreover, the gaze bias clearly depended on the face position as the initial fixation was guided by face position and landed on the closest half-face, toward the center of gravity of the face. The analysis of the subsequent fixations revealed that observers move their eyes from one side to the other. More importantly, no apparent link between gaze and perceptual biases was found here. This implies that we do not look necessarily toward the side of the face that we use to make a gender judgment task. Despite the fact that these results may be limited by the absence of perceptual and gaze biases in some conditions, we emphasized the inter-individual differences observed in terms of perceptual bias, hinting at the importance of performing individual analysis and drawing attention to the influence of the method used to study this bias.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在观察面部时存在左知觉偏差,这是因为观察者主要使用面部左侧(从观察者的角度来看)的信息来执行判断任务。这种偏差与右半球对面部处理的主导地位一致,有时与左注视偏差有关,即更多地或更长时间地注视面部的左侧。在这里,我们在两个不同的实验中记录了眼动,在性别判断任务中,使用正常和嵌合面孔,这些面孔分别出现在中央注视点上方、下方、右侧或左侧(中央位置)。参与者通过保持注视注视点或执行几次扫视(最多三次)来执行判断任务。由于取决于允许的扫视次数和面孔位置,因此没有系统地发现左知觉偏差。此外,注视偏差显然取决于面孔位置,因为初始注视受到面孔位置的引导,并落在最接近的半张脸,即面孔重心处。对随后的注视的分析表明,观察者将眼睛从一侧移到另一侧。更重要的是,在这里没有发现注视和知觉偏差之间的明显联系。这意味着我们不一定会看向我们用于进行性别判断任务的脸的一侧。尽管这些结果可能受到某些条件下缺乏知觉和注视偏差的限制,但我们强调了在知觉偏差方面观察到的个体差异,暗示了进行个体分析的重要性,并提请注意研究这种偏差时使用的方法的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bfc/3893266/78dffc23290b/pone.0085746.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验