• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴瘤患者对信息提供的满意度与基线相关,但与随访生活质量无关:来自PROFILES注册研究的结果。

Satisfaction with information provision is associated with baseline but not with follow-up quality of life among lymphoma patients: Results from the PROFILES registry.

作者信息

Husson O, Oerlemans S, Mols F, Smeets R E H, Poortmans P M, van de Poll-Franse L V

机构信息

Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):917-26. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.879201. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

DOI:10.3109/0284186X.2013.879201
PMID:24456497
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriate information provision is an important determinant of patient satisfaction and might also affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between perceived information provision at baseline and HRQoL, anxiety and depression among lymphoma patients two years later.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is part of a longitudinal, population-based survey among all lymphoma patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 as registered in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (southern part of The Netherlands). Patients between six months and 10 years after diagnoses received the first questionnaire including the EORTC QLQ-INFO25, EORTC QLQ-C30 and HADS at baseline (T1) and the second two years later (T2). All analyses are stratified for time since diagnosis (< 2 and ≥ 2 years since diagnosis).

RESULTS

At baseline 69% of the patients (n = 1186) responded, at T2 355 (30%) patients responded. For patients < 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information was associated with higher levels of cognitive functioning (ß = 0.46; p = 0.04) and lower levels of anxiety (ß = -0.41; p = 0.04) at baseline, no prospective relationships were found. For patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information (ß = 0.20; p = 0.03) was associated with better emotional functioning, while receiving more treatment information was associated with worse emotional functioning (ß = -0.21; p = 0.04). Among this group, satisfaction with the received information was associated with better functioning (ß ranging from -0.15 to -0.33; all p < 0.05) at baseline, and these relationships remained significant prospectively for physical (ß = -0.13; p = 0.02) and emotional functioning (ß = -0.13; p = 0.04) only. Stability of satisfaction with received information over time was associated with better emotional (ß = -0.13) and better cognitive functioning (ß = -0.09; p < 0.05) at T2.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that satisfaction with received information among lymphoma patients was associated with better HRQoL at baseline (only for patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis), but not at follow-up when corrected for baseline HRQoL.

摘要

背景

提供恰当的信息是患者满意度的一个重要决定因素,也可能影响癌症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。本研究的目的是调查基线时感知到的信息提供情况与两年后淋巴瘤患者的HRQoL、焦虑和抑郁之间的关系。

材料与方法

本研究是一项基于人群的纵向调查的一部分,研究对象为1999年至2009年在埃因霍温癌症登记处(荷兰南部)登记的所有淋巴瘤患者。诊断后6个月至10年的患者在基线时(T1)接受第一份问卷,包括欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的QLQ - INFO25、QLQ - C30和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS),两年后(T2)接受第二份问卷。所有分析按诊断后的时间分层(诊断后<2年和≥2年)。

结果

基线时69%的患者(n = 1186)做出了回应,T2时355名(30%)患者做出了回应。对于诊断后<2年的患者,在基线时,获得更多医学检查信息与较高水平的认知功能(β = 0.46;p = 0.04)和较低水平的焦虑(β = -0.41;p = 0.04)相关,未发现前瞻性关系。对于诊断后≥2年的患者,获得更多医学检查信息(β = 0.20;p = 0.03)与更好的情绪功能相关,而获得更多治疗信息与更差的情绪功能相关(β = -0.21;p = 0.04)。在这组患者中,对所获信息的满意度在基线时与更好的功能相关(β范围为 -0.15至 -0.33;所有p < 0.05),并且这些关系仅在身体(β = -0.13;p = 0.02)和情绪功能(β = -0.13;p = 0.04)方面前瞻性地保持显著。随着时间推移,对所获信息满意度的稳定性与T2时更好的情绪(β = -0.13)和更好的认知功能(β = -0.09;p < 0.05)相关。

结论

本研究表明,淋巴瘤患者对所获信息的满意度在基线时(仅针对诊断后≥2年的患者)与更好的HRQoL相关,但在对基线HRQoL进行校正后的随访中则不然。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction with information provision is associated with baseline but not with follow-up quality of life among lymphoma patients: Results from the PROFILES registry.淋巴瘤患者对信息提供的满意度与基线相关,但与随访生活质量无关:来自PROFILES注册研究的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):917-26. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.879201. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
2
Health-related quality of life and persistent symptoms in relation to (R-)CHOP14, (R-)CHOP21, and other therapies among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results of the population-based PHAROS-registry.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中与(R-)CHOP14、(R-)CHOP21及其他治疗相关的健康相关生活质量和持续症状:基于人群的PHAROS注册研究结果
Ann Hematol. 2014 Oct;93(10):1705-15. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2099-8. Epub 2014 May 8.
3
Illness perceptions in cancer survivors: what is the role of information provision?癌症幸存者的疾病认知:信息提供的作用是什么?
Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):490-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3042. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
4
Endometrial cancer survivors are unsatisfied with received information about diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry.子宫内膜癌幸存者对诊断、治疗和随访方面所获得的信息不满意:基于人群的 PROFILES 注册研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):427-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
5
Quality of life after successful treatment of early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: 10-year follow-up of the EORTC-GELA H8 randomised controlled trial.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤成功治疗后的生活质量:EORTC-GELA H8 随机对照试验的 10 年随访。
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70258-X. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
6
Elderly multiple myeloma patients experience less deterioration in health-related quality of life than younger patients compared to a normative population: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry.与正常人群相比,老年多发性骨髓瘤患者健康相关生活质量的恶化程度低于年轻患者:一项基于人群的PROFILES注册研究。
Ann Hematol. 2015 Apr;94(4):651-61. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2264-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
Quality of life more impaired in younger than in older diffuse large B cell lymphoma survivors compared to a normative population: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry.与一般人群相比,与年龄较大弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤幸存者相比,年轻的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤幸存者的生活质量受损更严重:一项来自基于人群的 PROFILES 登记研究。
Ann Hematol. 2014 May;93(5):811-9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1980-1. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
8
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) lymphoma survivors report lower health-related quality of life compared to a normative population: results from the PROFILES registry.青少年和青年(AYA)淋巴瘤幸存者报告的健康相关生活质量低于正常人群:来自PROFILES注册研究的结果。
Acta Oncol. 2017 Feb;56(2):288-294. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267404. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
9
Satisfaction with information provision in cancer patients and the moderating effect of Type D personality.癌症患者对信息提供的满意度与 D 型人格的调节作用。
Psychooncology. 2013 Sep;22(9):2124-32. doi: 10.1002/pon.3267. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
10
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.

引用本文的文献

1
Anxiety, depression and fear of cancer recurrence in uveal melanoma survivors and ophthalmologist/oncologist communication during survivorship in France - protocol of a prospective observational mixed-method study.眼黑色素瘤幸存者的焦虑、抑郁和对癌症复发的恐惧,以及法国生存随访期间眼科医生/肿瘤医生的沟通 - 前瞻性观察性混合方法研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06265-2.
2
Information Needs in Patients with Potentially Curable Gastroesophageal Cancer.潜在可治愈的胃食管交界癌患者的信息需求。
Dig Surg. 2024;41(3):122-132. doi: 10.1159/000540439. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
3
Integrated Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences in Children with Kidney and Hematological Diseases: A Pilot Study.
肾脏和血液疾病患儿患者报告结局与体验的综合收集:一项试点研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 19;10(7):1245. doi: 10.3390/children10071245.
4
Factors of emotional distress in lymphoma: A systematic review.淋巴瘤患者情绪困扰的因素:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14646-14662. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6069. Epub 2023 May 17.
5
Incremental levels of diagnostic information incentivize health-seeking in non-alcoholic fatty liver: a randomized clinical trial.诊断信息的逐步增加促使人们寻求非酒精性脂肪肝的治疗:一项随机临床试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 18;12(1):8272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12295-1.
6
Psychological support of esophageal cancer patient?食管癌患者的心理支持?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S654-S662. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.34.
7
Esophageal cancer patients' information management: cross-cultural differences between Dutch and Italian patients in perceived quality of provided oncological information.食管癌患者信息管理:荷兰和意大利患者对所提供肿瘤学信息质量感知的跨文化差异
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Aug;10(8):5123-5130. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.117.
8
The need for information among patients with hematological malignancies: Psychometric analyses of the 62-item Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire (HINQ-62).血液恶性肿瘤患者的信息需求:62 项血液学信息需求问卷(HINQ-62)的心理计量学分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201699. eCollection 2018.
9
Analysis of information received during treatment and adherence to tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者他莫昔芬治疗期间所获信息及依从性分析
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017;21(4):295-298. doi: 10.5114/wo.2017.72397. Epub 2017 Dec 30.
10
Reliability and validity of the Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire in lung cancer.《癌症治疗满意度问卷》在肺癌中的信效度研究
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1062-z. Epub 2015 Jul 21.