Raha Somik
Independent Researcher, California, USA.
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2013 Oct;4(4):198-205. doi: 10.4103/0975-9476.123688.
Double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are viewed as the golden standard of drug research in Western medicine. However, RCTs are far from "golden" in many respects. They are impractical for many therapies, such as for surgeries and complex lifestyle changes. They encourage a one-size-fits-all approach to medical treatment that fails to address the huge diversity among individual patients in terms of their physical and emotional symptoms, social and cultural upbringing, and other factors. Perhaps, more importantly, they do not help doctors make the best medical decisions required to produce optimal patient outcomes. To guide a search for an alternate model of medical research, three principles based on Ayurveda, an ancient and powerful system of health care that has stood the test of time, are presented. These principles, arrived at after mining Ayurvedic epistemology, are: Inductive learning, whole systems thinking, and individually optimized therapy. In honor of the ancient sages or "Rishis," whose voice is used to deliver Ayurvedic knowledge in the ancient texts of Ayurveda, these are referred to as the "Rishi principles." Common research methodologies are examined for embodiment of these principles.
双盲随机对照试验(RCTs)在西医中被视为药物研究的黄金标准。然而,随机对照试验在很多方面远非“黄金标准”。它们对许多疗法并不适用,比如手术和复杂的生活方式改变。它们鼓励一种一刀切的医疗方法,这种方法未能考虑到个体患者在身体和情绪症状、社会和文化背景以及其他因素方面的巨大差异。也许更重要的是,它们无助于医生做出实现最佳患者治疗效果所需的最佳医疗决策。为了引导寻找替代的医学研究模式,本文提出了基于阿育吠陀的三条原则,阿育吠陀是一个古老且强大的医疗体系,历经时间考验。这些原则是在挖掘阿育吠陀认识论后得出的,即:归纳学习、整体系统思维和个体化优化治疗。为了纪念古代圣人或“智者”,他们的声音在阿育吠陀的古代文献中被用来传授阿育吠陀知识,这些原则被称为“智者原则”。本文考察了常见研究方法中这些原则的体现情况。