• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:4例报告并文献复习

Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature.

作者信息

Bayoglu Tekin Yeşim, Mete Ural Ulku, Balık Gulşah, Ustuner Isık, Kır Şahin Figen, Güvendağ Güven Emine Seda

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, İslampaşa Mah, 53200, Rize, Turkey,

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1171-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6
PMID:24464347
Abstract

PURPOSE

To present the outcomes of four cases of cesarean scar pregnancy treated with suction curettage.

METHODS

Four patients were ultrasonographically diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancies treated with suction curettage in a tertiary care center.

RESULTS

Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels ranged between 1,681 and 15,573 mU/mL, gestational sac diameter measured from 10 to 24 mm and scar thickness was between 4.7 and 6.8 mm. All patients underwent suction curettage under general anesthesia with transabdominal ultrasonography guidance. No complications were observed during or after operation.

CONCLUSION

Suction curettage is a viable alternative for conservative treatment in selected cases of patients who are diagnosed with CSP early in gestation and who have a myometrial thickness of more than 4.5 mm.

摘要

目的

介绍4例采用刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的结果。

方法

4例患者经超声诊断为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠,在一家三级医疗中心接受刮宫术治疗。

结果

血清β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平在1681至15573 mU/mL之间,妊娠囊直径为10至24 mm,瘢痕厚度在4.7至6.8 mm之间。所有患者均在全身麻醉下经腹部超声引导下行刮宫术。术中及术后均未观察到并发症。

结论

对于妊娠早期诊断为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠且子宫肌层厚度超过4.5 mm的部分患者,刮宫术是一种可行的保守治疗替代方法。

相似文献

1
Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature.刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:4例报告并文献复习
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1171-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
2
Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效及安全性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857.
3
Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancies managed by suction curettage alone or in combination with other therapeutic procedures: A series of 33 cases and analysis of complication profile.单纯采用刮宫术或联合其他治疗方法处理的外源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:33例病例系列及并发症分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Aug;42(8):927-35. doi: 10.1111/jog.13017. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
Treatment of viable cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with suction curettage.采用刮宫术治疗存活的剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 May;89(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.038.
5
Successful treatment of endogenous cesarean scar pregnancies with transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone.单纯经腹超声引导下吸刮术成功治疗内生性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:20-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
6
Is ultrasound-guided suction curettage a reliable option for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy? A cross-sectional retrospective study.超声引导下刮宫术是治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的可靠选择吗?一项横断面回顾性研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Nov;31(22):2953-2958. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1359827. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.超声引导下刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
8
The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.经腹超声引导下单纯抽吸刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠疗效的超声参数价值。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jun;50(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jog.15927. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
9
Low-lying-implantation ectopic pregnancy: a cluster of cesarean scar, cervico-isthmus, and cervical ectopic pregnancies in the first trimester.低置植入型异位妊娠:一组孕早期的剖宫产瘢痕妊娠、宫颈峡部妊娠和宫颈妊娠。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;52(4):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.10.009.
10
Suction curettage as first line treatment in cases with cesarean scar pregnancy: feasibility and effectiveness in early pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病例中以吸刮术作为一线治疗:早期妊娠的可行性与有效性
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(7):1066-71. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1034100. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
2
Comparison of two different suction curettage methods in cesarean scar pregnancy treatment.比较两种不同的吸引刮宫方法在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗中的应用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06917-x.
3
Prevalence, Determinants, and Management Options of Scar Site Pregnancy in Women With Previous Cesarean Section: A Study From the Al-Qassim Region.
既往剖宫产女性瘢痕部位妊娠的患病率、影响因素及管理方案:来自卡西姆地区的一项研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65874. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞联合后续清宫术作为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的低风险治疗方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2350. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122350.
5
Letter to the editor related to the article "Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8‑year experience at a single institution" published by Xu et al.致编辑的信,与徐等人发表的文章《剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的手术结局:单机构8年经验》相关
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;305(4):1127-1128. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06132-5. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
6
Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.超声引导下刮宫术与宫腔镜检查在子宫动脉栓塞术后治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床效果分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 Jan 7;15:83-89. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S184387. eCollection 2019.
7
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) versus Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Debridement Surgery (LCSPDS) in Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)与腹腔镜剖宫产瘢痕妊娠清除术(LCSPDS)治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床疗效和安全性比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jul 6;24:4659-4666. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907404.
8
Management of persistent caesarean scar pregnancy after curettage treatment failure.刮宫治疗失败后持续性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的管理
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 1;17(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1395-4.