Guo Cong, Luo Yin, Zhou Ruhong, Wei Guanghong
State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics, Key Laboratory for Computational Physical Sciences (MOE), 220 Handan Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Nanoscale. 2014 Mar 7;6(5):2800-11. doi: 10.1039/c3nr02505e. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
Understanding the nature of the self-assembly of peptide nanostructures at the molecular level is critical for rational design of functional bio-nanomaterials. Recent experimental studies have shown that triphenylalanine(FFF)-based peptides can self-assemble into solid plate-like nanostructures and nanospheres, which are different from the hollow nanovesicles and nanotubes formed by diphenylalanine(FF)-based peptides. In spite of extensive studies, the assembly mechanism and the molecular basis for the structural differences between FFF and FF nanostructures remain poorly understood. In this work, we first investigate the assembly process and the structural features of FFF nanostructures using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, and then compare them with FF nanostructures. We find that FFF peptides spontaneously assemble into solid nanometer-sized nanospheres and nanorods with substantial β-sheet contents, consistent with the structural properties of hundred-nanometer-sized FFF nano-plates characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy. Distinct from the formation mechanism of water-filled FF nanovesicles and nanotubes reported in our previous study, intermediate bilayers are not observed during the self-assembly process of FFF nanospheres and nanorods. The peptides in FFF nanostructures are predominantly anti-parallel-aligned, which can form larger sizes of β-sheet-like structures than the FF counterparts. In contrast, FF peptides exhibit lipid-like assembly behavior and assemble into bilayered nanostructures. Furthermore, although the self-assembly of FF and FFF peptides is mostly driven by side chain-side chain (SC-SC) aromatic stacking interactions, the main chain-main chain (MC-MC) interactions also play an important role in the formation of fine structures of the assemblies. The delicate interplay between MC-MC and SC-SC interactions results in the different nanostructures formed by the two peptides. These findings provide new insights into the structure and self-assembly pathway of di-/tri-phenylalanine peptide assemblies, which might be helpful for the design of bioinspired nanostructures.
在分子水平上理解肽纳米结构的自组装性质对于功能性生物纳米材料的合理设计至关重要。最近的实验研究表明,基于三苯丙氨酸(FFF)的肽可以自组装成固体板状纳米结构和纳米球,这与基于二苯丙氨酸(FF)的肽形成的中空纳米囊泡和纳米管不同。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但FFF和FF纳米结构之间的组装机制和结构差异的分子基础仍知之甚少。在这项工作中,我们首先使用粗粒度分子动力学模拟研究FFF纳米结构的组装过程和结构特征,然后将它们与FF纳米结构进行比较。我们发现FFF肽自发组装成具有大量β-折叠含量的固体纳米尺寸的纳米球和纳米棒,这与通过傅里叶变换红外光谱表征的数百纳米尺寸的FFF纳米板的结构性质一致。与我们先前研究中报道的充满水的FF纳米囊泡和纳米管的形成机制不同,在FFF纳米球和纳米棒的自组装过程中未观察到中间双层。FFF纳米结构中的肽主要是反平行排列的,这可以形成比FF对应物更大尺寸的β-折叠样结构。相比之下,FF肽表现出类似脂质的组装行为并组装成双层纳米结构。此外,尽管FF和FFF肽的自组装主要由侧链-侧链(SC-SC)芳香族堆积相互作用驱动,但主链-主链(MC-MC)相互作用在组装精细结构的形成中也起着重要作用。MC-MC和SC-SC相互作用之间的微妙相互作用导致了两种肽形成不同的纳米结构。这些发现为二/三苯丙氨酸肽组装体的结构和自组装途径提供了新的见解,这可能有助于生物启发纳米结构的设计。