Price John M, Colflesh Gregory J H, Cerella John, Verhaeghen Paul
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States.
University of Maryland, United States.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
We investigated the effects of 10h of practice on variations of the N-Back task to investigate the processes underlying possible expansion of the focus of attention within working memory. Using subtractive logic, we showed that random access (i.e., Sternberg-like search) yielded a modest effect (a 50% increase in speed) whereas the processes of forward access (i.e., retrieval in order, as in a standard N-Back task) and updating (i.e., changing the contents of working memory) were executed about 5 times faster after extended practice. We additionally found that extended practice increased working memory capacity as measured by the size of the focus of attention for the forward-access task, but not for variations where probing was in random order. This suggests that working memory capacity may depend on the type of search process engaged, and that certain working-memory-related cognitive processes are more amenable to practice than others.
我们研究了10小时的练习对N-回溯任务变化的影响,以探究工作记忆中注意力焦点可能扩展的潜在过程。运用减法逻辑,我们发现随机访问(即类似斯特恩伯格的搜索)产生了适度的效果(速度提高了50%),而前向访问(即按顺序检索,如在标准N-回溯任务中)和更新(即改变工作记忆的内容)过程在长时间练习后执行速度提高了约5倍。我们还发现,长时间练习增加了工作记忆容量,这是通过前向访问任务中注意力焦点的大小来衡量的,但对于探测顺序随机的变体则没有增加。这表明工作记忆容量可能取决于所采用的搜索过程类型,并且某些与工作记忆相关的认知过程比其他过程更易于通过练习得到改善。