Department of Neurology, Istanbul Bilim University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey,
Neurol Sci. 2014 Jul;35(7):1083-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-1653-4. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
Our aim was to compare the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over supplementary motor area with that of sham stimulation in restless legs syndrome (RLS). In this prospective study, patients were randomly assigned to either real stimulation group (11 patients), or sham stimulation group (8 patients) in a double-blinded fashion. Five patients, who were initially in the sham stimulation group, received real stimulation 1 month after the sham stimulation. One session of intervention was performed once every 3 days and total of ten sessions were done in each group. The International RLS-Rating Scale (IRLS-RS) was assessed at baseline and after 5th and 10th sessions in both groups and also in five patients in whom both sham and real stimulation were performed. A statistically significant difference was seen in the IRLS scores between real (n = 11) and sham stimulation (n = 8) after 5th and 10th sessions. The real stimulation significantly improved the IRLS-RS scores although they were unaffected by the sham stimulation. In five patients, in whom both sham and real stimulation were performed, a statistically significant improvement was seen in the IRLS-RS scores with the real stimulation and a statistically significant difference was seen in the IRLS scores between real and sham stimulation after 10th session. In conclusion, this method is safe and non-invasive, and the results of this pilot study may support that rTMS has the potential to be used in the treatment of RLS, which should be verified in larger series.
我们的目的是比较高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对不宁腿综合征(RLS)的辅助运动区的影响与假刺激的影响。在这项前瞻性研究中,患者以双盲方式随机分为真刺激组(11 例)或假刺激组(8 例)。最初在假刺激组的 5 例患者在假刺激后 1 个月接受真刺激。每次干预 1 个疗程,每 3 天进行 1 次,每组共进行 10 个疗程。在两组患者中,在基线时和第 5 次和第 10 次治疗后评估国际 RLS 评分量表(IRLS-RS),并且在进行了假刺激和真刺激的 5 例患者中也进行了评估。在第 5 次和第 10 次治疗后,真刺激组(n = 11)与假刺激组(n = 8)的 IRLS 评分之间存在统计学显著差异。尽管假刺激对 IRLS-RS 评分没有影响,但真刺激显著改善了 IRLS-RS 评分。在进行了假刺激和真刺激的 5 例患者中,真刺激使 IRLS-RS 评分显著改善,而第 10 次治疗后,真刺激和假刺激之间的 IRLS 评分存在统计学显著差异。总之,这种方法安全无创,这项初步研究的结果可能支持 rTMS 有潜力用于治疗 RLS,这需要在更大的系列中得到验证。