Leão Eliseth Ribeiro, Farah Olga Guilhermina, Reis Elisa Aparecida Alves, Barros Claudia Garcia de, Mizoi Cristina Satoko
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2013 Dec;11(4):507-13. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082013000400018.
To describe the academic profile, research experience, beliefs, and self-efficacy in research of clinical nurses in a Magnet Journey™ hospital.
Quantitative descriptive designed to assess research experience of clinical nurses. The survey was divided into demographics characteristics; scientific/academic profile (Nursing degree; membership in academic research groups, involvement in papers, teaching activities, scientific conferences, and posters presented); beliefs related to nursing research (about skills, benefits to career, reputation of institution, patient care; job satisfaction level); and Research Self-Efficacy (conducting literature review; evaluating quality of studies; using theory; understanding evidence; and scientific writing: putting ideas on paper easily; recognize and adapt the text to the reader; write to the standards required by science; write with objectivity, logical sequence, coherence, simplicity, clarity, and precision; insert the references in the text correctly; write the references appropriately; use correct spelling and grammar; write texts in English).
Most clinical nurses had low research experience, yet had positive beliefs in and perception of well-developed research skills.
Our findings should contribute to the preparation of research programs aimed at facilitating the engagement of clinical nurses in the development of scientific projects.
描述一家“卓越护理之路”(Magnet Journey™)医院临床护士的学术概况、研究经历、信念及研究自我效能感。
采用定量描述性研究来评估临床护士的研究经历。该调查分为人口统计学特征;科学/学术概况(护理学位;学术研究团体成员身份、参与论文情况、教学活动、科学会议及展示的海报);与护理研究相关的信念(关于技能、对职业的益处、机构声誉、患者护理;工作满意度水平);以及研究自我效能感(进行文献综述;评估研究质量;运用理论;理解证据;以及科学写作:轻松将想法写在纸上;认识并使文本适合读者;按照科学要求的标准写作;客观、逻辑连贯、条理清晰、简洁明了且精确地写作;在文本中正确插入参考文献;恰当地撰写参考文献;使用正确的拼写和语法;用英语撰写文本)。
大多数临床护士研究经历较少,但对完善的研究技能有着积极的信念和认知。
我们的研究结果应为旨在促进临床护士参与科研项目开展的研究计划提供参考。