• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于几何形态计量分析的脑图谱标记:一项误差研究。

Landmarking the brain for geometric morphometric analysis: an error study.

作者信息

Chollet Madeleine B, Aldridge Kristina, Pangborn Nicole, Weinberg Seth M, Deleon Valerie B

机构信息

Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086005. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0086005
PMID:24489689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3904856/
Abstract

Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape analysis using coordinate data from biologically relevant landmarks is the preferred method for testing these aspects of phenotype. To date, approximately fifty landmarks have been used to study brain shape. Of the studies that have used landmark-based statistical shape analysis of the brain, most have not published protocols for landmark identification or the results of reliability studies on these landmarks. The primary aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to collaboratively develop detailed data collection protocols for a set of brain landmarks, and (2) to complete an intra- and inter-observer validation study of the set of landmarks. Detailed protocols were developed for 29 cortical and subcortical landmarks using a sample of 10 boys aged 12 years old. Average intra-observer error for the final set of landmarks was 1.9 mm with a range of 0.72 mm-5.6 mm. Average inter-observer error was 1.1 mm with a range of 0.40 mm-3.4 mm. This study successfully establishes landmark protocols with a minimal level of error that can be used by other researchers in the assessment of neuroanatomic phenotypes.

摘要

神经解剖学表型通常采用体积分析进行评估。尽管这种方法功能强大且用途广泛,但它也有局限性,即无法量化形状变化、描述区域之间的相互关系,或者确定大小变化是全局性的还是局部性的。使用来自生物学相关标志点的坐标数据进行统计形状分析是测试表型这些方面的首选方法。迄今为止,大约五十个标志点已被用于研究脑形状。在那些对大脑进行基于标志点的统计形状分析的研究中,大多数都没有公布标志点识别的方案或这些标志点可靠性研究的结果。本研究的主要目的有两个:(1)合作制定一套脑标志点的详细数据收集方案,(2)完成该套标志点的观察者内和观察者间验证研究。使用10名12岁男孩的样本为29个皮质和皮质下标志点制定了详细方案。最终标志点集的观察者内平均误差为1.9毫米,范围为0.72毫米至5.6毫米。观察者间平均误差为1.1毫米,范围为0.40毫米至3.4毫米。本研究成功建立了误差极小的标志点方案,可供其他研究人员用于评估神经解剖学表型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/d01898a128f4/pone.0086005.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/79eaf0584508/pone.0086005.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/422bb32aef1f/pone.0086005.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/d01898a128f4/pone.0086005.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/79eaf0584508/pone.0086005.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/422bb32aef1f/pone.0086005.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e49/3904856/d01898a128f4/pone.0086005.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Landmarking the brain for geometric morphometric analysis: an error study.用于几何形态计量分析的脑图谱标记:一项误差研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086005. eCollection 2014.
2
The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.自动化标志点识别对形态计量分析的影响。
J Anat. 2019 Jun;234(6):917-935. doi: 10.1111/joa.12973. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Measurement error in μCT-based three-dimensional geometric morphometrics introduced by surface generation and landmark data acquisition.基于μCT 的三维几何形态测量学中表面生成和标志点数据获取引起的测量误差。
J Anat. 2019 Aug;235(2):357-378. doi: 10.1111/joa.12999. Epub 2019 May 7.
4
Surface landmark quantification of embryonic mouse craniofacial morphogenesis.胚胎小鼠颅面形态发生的表面标志量化
BMC Dev Biol. 2014 Jul 24;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-14-31.
5
Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry.标志定位错误与传统和三维人体测量精度评估。
Appl Ergon. 2011 Mar;42(3):518-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
6
Rapid automated landmarking for morphometric analysis of three-dimensional facial scans.用于三维面部扫描形态计量分析的快速自动地标定位
J Anat. 2017 Apr;230(4):607-618. doi: 10.1111/joa.12576. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
7
Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.颅骨 3D 表面扫描中的自动标志点标注:方法学建议和可靠性研究。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Oct;210:106380. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106380. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
8
Anatomical landmarks for registration of experimental image data to volumetric rodent brain atlasing templates.用于将实验图像数据配准到啮齿动物脑图谱模板的解剖学标志。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Jan 30;240:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
Automated landmarking and geometric characterization of the carotid siphon.颈动脉虹吸自动定位和几何特征描述。
Med Image Anal. 2012 May;16(4):889-903. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
10
Fully Automatic Landmarking of Syndromic 3D Facial Surface Scans Using 2D Images.基于 2D 图像的综合征 3D 面部表面扫描全自动标志定位
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 3;20(11):3171. doi: 10.3390/s20113171.

引用本文的文献

1
A Baboon Brain Atlas for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography Image Analysis.用于磁共振成像和正电子发射断层扫描图像分析的狒狒脑图谱。
Front Neuroanat. 2022 Jan 14;15:778769. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.778769. eCollection 2021.
2
Accurate MR Image Registration to Anatomical Reference Space for Diffuse Glioma.将弥散性胶质瘤的磁共振图像精确配准到解剖学参考空间
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 5;14:585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00585. eCollection 2020.
3
A Systematist's Guide to Estimating Bayesian Phylogenies From Morphological Data.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional surface deformation-based shape analysis of hippocampus and caudate nucleus in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.基于三维表面变形的胎儿酒精谱系障碍患儿海马体和尾状核形状分析
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Feb;35(2):659-72. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22209. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
2
Statistical shape analysis of the corpus callosum in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症胼胝体的统计形状分析。
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:547-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.024. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
3
Metric distances between hippocampal shapes indicate different rates of change over time in nondemented and demented subjects.
从形态学数据估计贝叶斯系统发育树的系统学家指南
Insect Syst Divers. 2019 May;3(3):2. doi: 10.1093/isd/ixz006. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics on MRI images: An example of inter-operator bias in 3D landmarks and its impact on big datasets.基于普罗克鲁斯的 MRI 图像几何形态测量学:三维标志点中操作者间偏差的一个实例及其对大数据集的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197675. eCollection 2018.
5
Macroanatomical Landmarks Featuring Junctions of Major Sulci and Fissures and Scalp Landmarks Based on the International 10-10 System for Analyzing Lateral Cortical Development of Infants.基于国际10-10系统的婴儿外侧皮质发育分析中,以主要脑沟和脑裂交界处为特征的大体解剖标志及头皮标志。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jul 11;11:394. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00394. eCollection 2017.
6
Ventricular shape and relative position abnormalities in preterm neonates.早产儿的心室形态和相对位置异常。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 28;15:483-493. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.05.025. eCollection 2017.
7
Conformal invariants for multiply connected surfaces: Application to landmark curve-based brain morphometry analysis.多连通曲面的共形不变量:在基于地标曲线的脑形态计量学分析中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:517-529. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
海马形状的度量距离表明非痴呆和痴呆受试者随时间变化的速率不同。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012 Oct;9(8):972-81. doi: 10.2174/156720512803251138.
4
Are there progressive brain changes in schizophrenia? A meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies.精神分裂症是否存在进行性脑改变?结构磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul 1;70(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
Patterns of differences in brain morphology in humans as compared to extant apes.与现生猿类相比,人类大脑形态的差异模式。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Jan;60(1):94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
6
Brain growth across the life span in autism: age-specific changes in anatomical pathology.自闭症患者的全生命周期大脑发育:解剖病理学的年龄特异性变化。
Brain Res. 2011 Mar 22;1380:138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.101. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: what have we learned and where are we going?儿童脑发育的结构 MRI:我们学到了什么,我们的方向在哪里?
Neuron. 2010 Sep 9;67(5):728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.040.
8
Fully automated analysis using BRAINS: AutoWorkup.使用 BRAINS:AutoWorkup 进行全自动分析。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.047. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
9
Quantitative evaluation of LDDMM, FreeSurfer, and CARET for cortical surface mapping.基于 LDDMM、FreeSurfer 和 CARET 的皮质表面映射的定量评估。
Neuroimage. 2010 Aug 1;52(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.085. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Comparison of landmark-based and automatic methods for cortical surface registration.基于标志点和自动方法的皮质表面配准比较。
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2479-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.027. Epub 2009 Sep 28.