Graham Jove, Bowen Thomas R, Strohecker Kent A, Irgit Kaan, Smith Wade R
Geisinger Center for Health Research, 100 N, Academy Ave,, Danville PA 17822, USA.
Patient Saf Surg. 2014 Feb 3;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-8-7.
Hip fracture patients experience high morbidity and mortality rates in the first post-operative year after discharge. We compared mortality, utilization, costs, pain and function between two prospective cohorts of hip fracture patients, both managed with identical perioperative protocols and one group subsequently managed via a "Patient-Centered Medical Home" (PCMH) primary care management model.
We analyzed 6 and 12-month outcomes from two matched cohorts of patients who were surgically treated for hip fracture from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 at two hospitals (n = 194). Controls did not receive PCMH and were matched to cases on surgery date, sex, age, and comorbidities. Mortality and healthcare utilization were the primary outcomes studied, with medical costs, quality of life, pain and function at 12 months assessed as secondary outcomes in a subgroup. Survival analysis, regression and Student-t testing were used with p < 0.05 considered significant.
At 6 months, PCMH patients had significantly lower mortality than patients receiving standard care (11% vs. 26%, p < 0.01). At 12 months, a difference persisted (23% vs. 30%, p = 0.12) but was no longer statistically significant. Mean quality of life scores were similar (0.73 vs. 0.76, p = 0.49) and Harris Hip score was slightly improved for PCMH (73 vs. 64, p = 0.04). Mean costs per patient per month were lower for PCMH but not significantly different ($69 vs. $141, p = 0.20 for pharmacy costs; $1212 vs. $1452, p = 0.45 for non-pharmacy costs).
Patients receiving aggressive post-discharge care from a PCMH program showed significant benefits in terms of reduced mortality at 6 months, with similar costs and functional outcomes at 12 months. PCMH was not shown to improve all outcomes studied, but these results suggest that ongoing Medical Home management can have some benefit for patients without negatively impacting function or cost.
髋部骨折患者在出院后的首个术后年度内发病率和死亡率较高。我们比较了两组前瞻性髋部骨折患者队列的死亡率、医疗资源利用情况、费用、疼痛及功能,两组患者围手术期治疗方案相同,其中一组后续采用“以患者为中心的医疗之家”(PCMH)初级保健管理模式。
我们分析了2010年1月1日至2011年6月30日在两家医院接受髋部骨折手术治疗的两组匹配患者队列在6个月和12个月时的结局(n = 194)。对照组未接受PCMH模式,在手术日期、性别、年龄和合并症方面与病例组匹配。死亡率和医疗资源利用情况是主要研究结局,在一个亚组中,将12个月时的医疗费用、生活质量、疼痛及功能作为次要结局进行评估。采用生存分析、回归分析和Student - t检验,p < 0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
在6个月时,接受PCMH模式的患者死亡率显著低于接受标准治疗的患者(11% 对26%,p < 0.01)。在12个月时,差异仍然存在(23% 对30%,p = 0.12),但不再具有统计学意义。平均生活质量评分相似(0.73对0.76,p = 0.49),PCMH组的Harris髋关节评分略有改善(73对64,p = 0.04)。PCMH组患者每月的平均费用较低,但差异无统计学意义(药房费用:69美元对141美元,p = 0.20;非药房费用:1212美元对1452美元,p = 0.45)。
接受PCMH项目积极出院后护理的患者在6个月时死亡率显著降低,在12个月时费用和功能结局相似,显示出显著益处。PCMH模式并未改善所有研究结局,但这些结果表明持续的医疗之家管理对患者可能有一定益处,且不会对功能或费用产生负面影响。