Suppr超能文献

科学与实践之间的差距:治疗师如何做出临床决策。

The gap between science and practice: how therapists make their clinical decisions.

机构信息

University of Reading.

University of Reading.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2014 Mar;45(2):199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Abstract

Recent surveys have found that many patients are not receiving empirically supported treatments and that therapists may not update their knowledge of research. Studies have found that therapists prefer to use their clinical experience rather than research findings to improve their practice, although cognitive behavioral (CB) practitioners have been found to use research more frequently than therapists of other theoretical orientations. The organization in which therapists work has been shown to impact attitudes toward working practices, but studies have not examined whether workplace requirements to use research affect therapists' practice. Studies to date have mainly been conducted in North America. These findings may not be generalizable to the United Kingdom where there is a National Health Service (NHS), which requires the use of empirically supported treatments. The first part of this study aimed to investigate which factors were influential in therapists' choice of theoretical orientation and to see whether CB practitioners differed from other therapists in the factors that influenced their choice of theoretical orientation. The second part tested whether therapists' theoretical orientation or their workplace influenced the frequency with which they used research in their clinical decision-making. The final part investigated whether being a CB practitioner or working in the NHS was associated with having a favorable attitude toward research. An online survey was sent to 4,144 psychological therapists in England; 736 therapists responded (18.5%). Therapists reported that research had little influence over their choice of theoretical orientation and clinical decision-making compared to other factors, specifically clinical experience and supervision. CB practitioners and NHS therapists, regardless of their orientation, were significantly more likely to use research than other therapists and were more likely to have a positive attitude toward research.

摘要

最近的调查发现,许多患者并未接受经验证的支持性治疗,治疗师可能也没有更新他们对研究的了解。研究发现,治疗师更愿意使用自己的临床经验而不是研究结果来改进自己的实践,尽管认知行为(CB)从业者被发现比其他理论取向的治疗师更频繁地使用研究。治疗师工作的组织已经被证明会影响他们对工作实践的态度,但研究尚未探讨工作场所要求使用研究是否会影响治疗师的实践。迄今为止,研究主要在北美进行。这些发现可能不适用于英国,因为英国有国民保健制度(NHS),要求使用经验证的治疗方法。本研究的第一部分旨在调查哪些因素会影响治疗师选择理论取向,并观察 CB 从业者与其他治疗师在影响其理论取向选择的因素方面是否存在差异。第二部分测试了治疗师的理论取向或工作场所是否会影响他们在临床决策中使用研究的频率。第三部分调查了作为 CB 从业者或在 NHS 工作是否与对研究持有利态度有关。一项在线调查发送给了英格兰的 4144 名心理治疗师;有 736 名治疗师做出了回应(18.5%)。治疗师报告说,与其他因素相比,研究对他们的理论取向选择和临床决策的影响较小,特别是临床经验和监督。CB 从业者和 NHS 治疗师,无论其取向如何,都比其他治疗师更有可能使用研究,并且更有可能对研究持积极态度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验