药学干预对流感疫苗接种接受度的影响:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Impact of pharmacy intervention on influenza vaccination acceptance: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
机构信息
Doctor Evidence, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France.
出版信息
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Oct;43(5):1163-1172. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01250-1. Epub 2021 May 28.
Background Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of influenza. Channels that improve vaccination adherence can play a vital part in improving patient care. This study seeks to inform the design and implementation of pharmacy interventions at scale on improving influenza vaccination rates. Aim of the review The aim of this study was to identify key success factors for effective pharmacy intervention design and implementation to improve vaccination acceptance rates in influenza. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed to find literature on influenza vaccinations delivered at pharmacies, pharmacist-delivered influenza vaccinations, or influenza vaccination campaigns originating in the pharmacy setting. A meta-analysis using a random effects model estimated the impact of pharmacy intervention on vaccination rates (assessed as relative risk [RR] and 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]). Results A total of 1221 studies were found that met the search criteria, of which 12 were selected for the literature review following eligibility screening. A meta-analysis of studies that contained binary total population and vaccination rate data was conducted on 6 studies, including 3182 participants, the vaccination rate was 24% higher in those who used the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who used standard care [RR (95% CI) 1.24 (1.05, 1.47)]. Two separate sensitivity analyses were run for the vaccination rate. In participants aged ≥ 65 years, the vaccination rate was 3% higher in those who received the pharmacy-based intervention compared with those who received standard care; however, this change was not significant [RR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.86, 1.24)]. Additionally, a qualitative review showed that more successful pharmacy-based interventions were those with the more active involvement of pharmacists in routine care. This included regular checkup of vaccine status, proactive conversations and recommendations about vaccination, and pharmacy-based immunization programs, with specific vaccination days. In-pharmacy communication rather than passive information, such as through leaflets and posters was also more effective. Conclusion Pharmacists can play a significant role to improve patient treatment, adherence, and outcomes associated with influenza vaccines. Once pharmacy-based immunization is established, proactive involvement of is key to ensure successful program implementation and results. Expanding access for pharmacists and pharmacy intervention to provide vaccinations may increase vaccination acceptance and could be a valuable intervention in patient care. Additional studies should consider high-risk populations to inform optimal design and implementation strategies.
背景 接种疫苗在预防流感方面发挥着重要作用。改善接种依从性的渠道可以在改善患者护理方面发挥重要作用。本研究旨在为大规模设计和实施改善流感疫苗接种率的药房干预措施提供信息。
研究目的 本研究的目的是确定有效药房干预措施设计和实施的关键成功因素,以提高流感疫苗接种率。
方法 对 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 进行系统检索,以查找在药房进行的流感疫苗接种、药剂师提供的流感疫苗接种或起源于药房环境的流感疫苗接种运动方面的文献。使用随机效应模型对药房干预措施对疫苗接种率的影响进行了荟萃分析(评估为相对风险 [RR]和 95%置信区间 [95%CI])。
结果 共发现符合搜索标准的 1221 项研究,经过资格筛选后,有 12 项研究被纳入文献综述。对包含总体人群和接种率数据的二进制数据的 6 项研究进行了荟萃分析,包括 3182 名参与者,与接受标准护理的参与者相比,使用基于药房的干预措施的参与者的接种率高出 24%[RR(95%CI)1.24(1.05,1.47)]。对接种率进行了两次单独的敏感性分析。在年龄≥65 岁的参与者中,接受基于药房的干预措施的参与者的接种率比接受标准护理的参与者高出 3%;然而,这一变化并不显著[RR(95%CI)1.03(0.86,1.24)]。此外,定性审查表明,药剂师更积极地参与常规护理的基于药房的干预措施更成功。这包括定期检查疫苗接种状况、关于接种疫苗的主动对话和建议,以及具有特定接种日的基于药房的免疫计划。与通过传单和海报等被动信息相比,药房内的沟通效果更好。
结论 药剂师可以在改善与流感疫苗相关的患者治疗、依从性和结果方面发挥重要作用。一旦建立了基于药房的免疫接种,积极参与是确保成功实施和结果的关键。扩大药剂师和药房干预措施的机会以提供疫苗接种可能会提高疫苗接种率,并且是患者护理中的一项有价值的干预措施。应开展更多研究以确定高危人群的最佳设计和实施策略。