• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于“累积语义抑制”效应的起源。

On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect.

机构信息

Aix-Marseille Université and C.N.R.S., 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):57-66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.57.

DOI:10.3758/MC.38.1.57
PMID:19966239
Abstract

We investigated whether the cumulative semantic inhibition effect found by Howard, Nickels, Coltheart, and Cole-Virtue (2006) provides information about semantic representations. By applying more sensitive statistical analyses to the original data set, we found a significant variation in the magnitude of the effect across categories. This variation cannot be explained by the naming speed of each category. In addition, using a subsample of the data, a second cumulative effect arouse for newly defined supracategories, over and above the effect of the original ones. We discuss these findings in terms of the representations that drive lexical access and show that they favor featural or distributed hypotheses.

摘要

我们研究了霍华德、尼克尔斯、科尔泰特和科尔-维特(2006)发现的累积语义抑制效应是否提供了关于语义表示的信息。通过对原始数据集应用更敏感的统计分析,我们发现该效应在类别之间的幅度存在显著差异。这种变化不能用每个类别的命名速度来解释。此外,使用数据的一个子样本,在新定义的超类别上产生了第二个累积效应,超过了原始类别的效应。我们根据驱动词汇访问的表示形式讨论了这些发现,并表明它们支持特征或分布式假设。

相似文献

1
On the origin of the "cumulative semantic inhibition" effect.关于“累积语义抑制”效应的起源。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):57-66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.57.
2
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.语义类别序列的内隐学习:独立于反应的抽象序列规律习得
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):394-406. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.394.
4
The cumulative semantic cost does not reflect lexical selection by competition.累积语义成本并不反映竞争导致的词汇选择。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
5
Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.在语义阻塞范式中评估的图片命名中的难治性效应。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 May;58(4):667-92. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142.
6
Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.语义记忆的结构与衰退:一项神经心理学与计算研究。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):205-35. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205.
7
Reading aloud: the cumulative lexical interference effect.朗读:累积词汇干扰效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):662-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0269-z.
8
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
9
The paca that roared: Immediate cumulative semantic interference among newly acquired words.哇哇叫的树鼠:新习得词汇即时累加的语义干扰
Cognition. 2018 Aug;177:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
10
Visual word recognition: evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback.视觉词识别:对语义反馈的全局和局部控制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):689-703. doi: 10.1037/a0018741.

引用本文的文献

1
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".关于使用图片-单词干扰范式研究的警示:随意使用“有生命/无生命”概念带来的不良后果
Front Psychol. 2023 May 5;14:1145884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884. eCollection 2023.
2
Effortful Retrieval Practice Effects in Lexical Access: A Role for Semantic Competition.词汇提取中努力检索练习的效果:语义竞争的作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(8):948-963. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2027991. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Cumulative semantic interference is blind to morphological complexity and originates at the conceptual level.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.语义范畴特异性缺损的事实是什么?临床证据的批判性评价。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):213-61. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000266.
2
The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production.增量学习的阴暗面:言语产生中词汇通达过程中累积语义干扰的模型。
Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):227-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
3
Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.
累积语义干扰对形态复杂性是盲目的,并且起源于概念层面。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0268915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268915. eCollection 2022.
4
"Did I Say ?" Error Patterns on a Blocked Cyclic Naming Task for Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.“我刚才说了吗?”针对有和没有发育性语言障碍的双语儿童的受阻循环命名任务中的错误模式。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Apr 27;63(4):1148-1164. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00041. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.随机连续命名任务中言语错误产生的语义干扰:来自失语症的证据。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019;34(1):69-86. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1501500. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Cognitive style modulates semantic interference effects: evidence from field dependency.认知风格调节语义干扰效应:来自场依存性的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Mar;237(3):755-768. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5457-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Semantic interference and its control: A functional neuroimaging and connectivity study.语义干扰及其控制:一项功能神经影像学与连通性研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):4179-4196. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23304.
8
What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?书面文字能告诉我们关于言语产生中的词汇检索的哪些信息?
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 6;6:1982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01982. eCollection 2015.
9
Specifying the role of the left prefrontal cortex in word selection.明确左前额叶皮质在单词选择中的作用。
Brain Lang. 2015 Oct;149:135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
10
Long-lasting semantic interference effects in object naming are not necessarily conceptually mediated.物体命名中持久的语义干扰效应不一定由概念介导。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 7;6:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00578. eCollection 2015.
词汇选择并非通过竞争:对图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰和促进效应的重新诠释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):503-35. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
4
Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: experimental and computational studies.图片命名中的累积语义抑制:实验与计算研究
Cognition. 2006 Jul;100(3):464-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
5
Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.表征物体和动作词汇的意义:特征性与整体性语义空间假说
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jun;48(4):422-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.
6
The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.语义认知的并行分布式处理方法。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Apr;4(4):310-22. doi: 10.1038/nrn1076.
7
Semantic distance effects on object and action naming.
Cognition. 2002 Oct;85(3):B61-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00107-5.
8
No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model.没有说话的权利?物体命名与语义障碍之间的关系:神经心理学证据及计算模型
J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Apr 1;13(3):341-56. doi: 10.1162/08989290151137395.
9
Connectionist modelling in psychology: a localist manifesto.心理学中的联结主义建模:一份局部主义宣言。
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Aug;23(4):443-67; discussion 467-512. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003356.
10
On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.论词义特征表征的性质与范围。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997 Jun;126(2):99-130. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.126.2.99.