Kjørstad Åsmund, Corteville Dominique M R, Henzler Thomas, Schmid-Bindert Gerald, Hodneland Erlend, Zöllner Frank G, Schad Lothar R
Computer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany,
MAGMA. 2014 Dec;27(6):467-76. doi: 10.1007/s10334-014-0432-9. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
The Fourier decomposition (FD) method is a noninvasive method for assessing ventilation and perfusion-related information in the lungs, but the lack of quantifiable values is a drawback. We demonstrate a novel technique for quantification of the FD ventilation maps, compare it to two published methods, and show results from both healthy volunteers and patients diagnosed with lung cancer.
We quantified the standard FD ventilation images by utilizing additional information, i.e., the zero-frequency component image, which is also obtained from the Fourier analysis. This image acts as a baseline for the changes recorded in the FD ventilation image and can therefore be used to calculate the ventilation. Using this technique, we compared the ventilation values from ten healthy volunteers and ten patients to two previously published methods for quantitative ventilation assessment.
All methods showed good overall agreement (mean difference between the methods was 14-38 ml/min). The mean minute ventilation for the FD method was calculated to be 693 ml/min for a 2D slice, which is in the expected range.
The zero-frequency component image can be used as a baseline to quantify the FD ventilation maps. Our initial study showed good agreement with published methods in healthy volunteers, but less so in patients with lung cancer.
傅里叶分解(FD)方法是一种评估肺部通气和灌注相关信息的非侵入性方法,但缺乏可量化值是一个缺点。我们展示了一种量化FD通气图的新技术,将其与两种已发表的方法进行比较,并展示了健康志愿者和被诊断为肺癌患者的结果。
我们通过利用额外信息,即同样从傅里叶分析中获得的零频率分量图像,对标准FD通气图像进行量化。该图像作为FD通气图像中记录变化的基线,因此可用于计算通气量。使用这种技术,我们将10名健康志愿者和10名患者的通气值与两种先前发表的定量通气评估方法进行了比较。
所有方法总体上显示出良好的一致性(方法之间的平均差异为14 - 38毫升/分钟)。对于二维切片,FD方法的平均分钟通气量经计算为693毫升/分钟,处于预期范围内。
零频率分量图像可作为量化FD通气图的基线。我们的初步研究表明,在健康志愿者中与已发表方法具有良好的一致性,但在肺癌患者中一致性较差。