Suppr超能文献

关于人类孕期子宫和脐血流研究的综述。

Review of studies in human pregnancy of uterine and umbilical blood flows.

作者信息

Battaglia Frederick C, Meschia Giacomo

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Pernatal Research Center, 13243 East 23rd Avenue, F441, Aurora, CO 80045 USA,

出版信息

Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):287-92.

Abstract

Uterine and umbilical blood flow measurements are reviewed in terms of studies carried out in uncomplicated human pregnancies. The review includes the perspective of how those estimates of flow fit with current knowledge of human fetal O2 consumption and uterine O2 and glucose consumption. From the consideration of both the O2 data and the flow measurements, we conclude that the best estimates for mean umbilical blood flow at term range between 120 and 145 ml•min-1•(kg fetus)-1. The uterine flow estimate from physiologic data would equate to ~270 ml•min-1•(kg fetus)-1. This estimate, based upon estimates of uterine O2 and glucose consumption, is much higher than some estimates made by imaging techniques. The reasons for this discrepancy are not yet established. However, given the enormous variability in uterine flow measurements made with imaging techniques, it is clear that more research into improvement in these non-invasive approaches is still required and all current estimates of uterine flow must be regarded as rather crude trials.

摘要

本文根据在正常人类妊娠中开展的研究,对子宫和脐血流测量进行了综述。该综述涵盖了这些血流估计值如何与当前关于人类胎儿氧气消耗以及子宫氧气和葡萄糖消耗的知识相契合的观点。通过对氧气数据和血流测量的综合考量,我们得出结论,足月时平均脐血流的最佳估计值范围在120至145毫升·分钟⁻¹·(每千克胎儿)⁻¹之间。根据生理数据得出的子宫血流估计值约为270毫升·分钟⁻¹·(每千克胎儿)⁻¹。基于子宫氧气和葡萄糖消耗估计得出的这一数值,远高于一些通过成像技术得出的估计值。这种差异的原因尚未明确。然而,鉴于成像技术测量子宫血流时存在巨大差异,显然仍需要对这些非侵入性方法的改进进行更多研究,并且目前所有子宫血流估计值都必须被视为相当粗略的尝试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验