• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论稀有性信息在说话者框架选择中的作用。

On the role of rarity information in speakers' choice of frame.

作者信息

Honda Hidehito, Matsuka Toshihiko

机构信息

Digital Content and Media Sciences Division, National Institute of Informatics, 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8430, Japan,

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2014 Jul;42(5):768-79. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0399-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-014-0399-9
PMID:24523047
Abstract

In this article, we examine conversational behaviors when people describe the outcomes of uncertain events. We propose a new hypothesis, frame choice based on rarity information, that is built on the basis of one prominent measure of informativeness (i.e., self-information). The hypothesis predicts that when speakers can choose one of two logically equivalent frames for describing the outcome of an uncertain event (e.g., the results of the roll of a die or a medical operation), they prefer the frame denoting an event that is known or perceived to be rare. Four experiments using frame choice tasks provide evidence that speakers' choice of frame is explained well by the rarity hypothesis.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了人们在描述不确定事件结果时的对话行为。我们提出了一个新的假设,即基于稀有性信息的框架选择,该假设是基于一种突出的信息量度(即自信息)构建的。该假设预测,当说话者可以选择两个逻辑等价的框架之一来描述不确定事件的结果时(例如,掷骰子的结果或医疗手术的结果),他们会更喜欢表示已知或被认为稀有的事件的框架。四项使用框架选择任务的实验提供了证据,表明说话者对框架的选择可以很好地由稀有性假设来解释。

相似文献

1
On the role of rarity information in speakers' choice of frame.论稀有性信息在说话者框架选择中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Jul;42(5):768-79. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0399-9.
2
What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects.演讲者的框架选择揭示了什么:参考点、框架选择和框架效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):596-602. doi: 10.3758/bf03196520.
3
The neural basis of free language choice in bilingual speakers: Disentangling language choice and language execution.双语者自由语言选择的神经基础:语言选择与语言执行的分离。
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 15;177:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.025. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Verbal probabilities: an alternative approach.言语概率:一种替代方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(1):124-46. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.793731. Epub 2013 May 28.
5
Communicative functions of directional verbal probabilities: Speaker's choice, listener's inference, and reference points.方向性言语概率的交际功能:说话者的选择、听者的推断及参照点
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2141-2158. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1225779. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Verbal behavior and risky choice in humans: Exploring the boundaries of the description-experience gap.人类的言语行为与风险选择:探索描述-体验差距的边界
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:301-308. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
7
Perspective-Taking in Referential Communication: Does Stimulated Attention to Addressees' Perspective Influence Speakers' Reference Production?指称性交流中的视角采择:对听话者视角的激发性关注会影响说话者的指称表达吗?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Apr;48(2):257-288. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9602-7.
8
Do People Explicitly Make a Frame Choice Based on the Reference Point?人们是否会基于参考点明确做出框架选择?
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 17;9:2552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02552. eCollection 2018.
9
Consistency between verbal and non-verbal affective cues: a clue to speaker credibility.言语与非言语情感线索之间的一致性:说话者可信度的一个线索。
Cogn Emot. 2017 Jun;31(4):645-656. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1147422. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: a follow-up study.重度创伤性脑损伤后的对话语篇能力:一项随访研究。
Brain Inj. 1998 Nov;12(11):911-35. doi: 10.1080/026990598121981.

引用本文的文献

1
The Framing Preference for Large and Increasing Components in Static and Dynamic Descriptions.静态和动态描述中对大的且不断增加的组成部分的框架偏好。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 18;12:720427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720427. eCollection 2021.
2
Special Number or a Mere Numerical Array? Effect of Repdigits on Judgments and Choices.特殊数字还是仅仅是数字组合?重复数字对判断和选择的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1551. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01551. eCollection 2020.
3
Do People Explicitly Make a Frame Choice Based on the Reference Point?

本文引用的文献

1
Positivity of the English language.英语的积极性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029484. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
2
The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification.否定句验证的认知动态。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;35(5):983-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01164.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
3
When the truth is not too hard to handle: an event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation.当真相并非难以应对时:一项关于否定语用学的事件相关电位研究
人们是否会基于参考点明确做出框架选择?
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 17;9:2552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02552. eCollection 2018.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Dec;19(12):1213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x.
4
A Bayesian view of covariation assessment.共变评估的贝叶斯观点。
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Feb;54(1):33-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
5
Information leakage from logically equivalent frames.来自逻辑等效帧的信息泄露。
Cognition. 2006 Oct;101(3):467-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
6
What a speaker's choice of frame reveals: reference points, frame selection, and framing effects.演讲者的框架选择揭示了什么:参考点、框架选择和框架效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):596-602. doi: 10.3758/bf03196520.
7
The effect of negation on deductive inferences.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Mar;28(2):303-17. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.2.303.
8
Do Conditional Hypotheses Target Rare Events?
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2001 Jul;85(2):291-309. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.2947.
9
The psychological side of Hempel's paradox of confirmation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Jun;7(2):360-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03212994.
10
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.并非所有框架都是一样的:框架效应的类型学与批判性分析
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 Nov;76(2):149-188. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.