Department of Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
The purpose of this research was to examine the knowledge and perceptions of family leave policies and practices among senior leaders including American Association of Medical College members of the Group on Women in Medicine and Science (GWIMS) to identify perceived barriers to career success and satisfaction among female faculty.
In 2011 and 2012, GWIMS representatives and senior leaders at 24 medical schools were invited to participate in an interview about faculty perceptions of gender equity and overall institutional climate. An inductive, thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted to identify themes represented in participant responses. The research team read and reviewed institutional family leave policies for concordance with key informant descriptions.
There were 22 GWIMS representatives and senior leaders in the final sample. Participants were all female; 18 (82%) were full professors with the remainder being associate professors. Compared with publicly available policies at each institution, the knowledge of nine participants was consistent with policies, was discrepant for six, with the remaining seven acknowledging a lack of knowledge of policies. Four major themes were identified from the interview data: 1) Framing family leave as a personal issue undermines its effect on female faculty success; 2) poor communication of policies impairs access and affects organizational climate; 3) discrepancies in leave implementation disadvantage certain faculty in terms of time and pay; and 4) leave policies are valued and directly related to academic productivity.
Family leave policies are an important aspect of faculty satisfaction and academic success, yet policy awareness among senior leaders is lacking. Further organizational support is needed to promote equitable policy creation and implementation to support women in medical academia.
本研究旨在考察包括美国医学学院女性医学与科学团体(GWIMS)成员在内的高级领导人对家庭休假政策和实践的了解和看法,以确定女性教师在职业成功和满意度方面感知到的障碍。
在 2011 年和 2012 年,GWIMS 代表和 24 所医学院的高级领导人受邀参加了一项关于教师对性别公平和整体机构氛围的看法的访谈。对定性数据进行了归纳、主题分析,以确定参与者反应中代表的主题。研究小组阅读并审查了机构家庭休假政策,以与关键知情人的描述保持一致。
最终样本中有 22 名 GWIMS 代表和高级领导人。参与者均为女性;18 人(82%)为正教授,其余为副教授。与每个机构公开的政策相比,9 名参与者的知识与政策一致,6 名参与者的知识与政策不一致,其余 7 名参与者承认对政策缺乏了解。从访谈数据中确定了四个主要主题:1)将家庭休假视为个人问题会削弱其对女性教师成功的影响;2)政策沟通不畅会影响获取机会并影响组织氛围;3)休假实施中的差异会使某些教师在时间和薪酬方面处于不利地位;4)休假政策受到重视,并与学术生产力直接相关。
家庭休假政策是教师满意度和学术成功的一个重要方面,但高级领导人对政策的认识不足。需要进一步的组织支持,以促进公平的政策制定和实施,以支持医学学术界的女性。