Ye Xiaohua, Yao Zhenjiang, Gao Yanhui, Xu Ya, Xu Ying, Zhu Zhengwei, Chen Sidong, Yang Yi
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 17;4(2):e004273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004273.
Smoke-free legislation was implemented in Guangzhou on 1 September 2010. However, the smoke-free policy did not cover all indoor areas and smoking rooms can be set in some public places. This study aimed to assess changes in self-reported second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure in different types of venues and in homes, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of smoke-free legislation.
METHODS/DESIGN: A repeated cross-sectional survey of representative participants was conducted in Guangzhou before and after the smoke-free legislation. Logistic regression models were used to examine the effectiveness of smoke-free legislation.
Self-reported exposure to SHS,antitobacco advertisements and tobacco advertisements.
A total of 4900 participants before the ban and 5135 participants after the ban were selected using a multistage stratified design.
In full smoking ban places, overall self-reported SHS exposure has declined significantly from 58.8% to 50.3% (p<0.05) with greater drops in cultural venues, government offices and commercial venues. The smoke-free policy did not alter SHS exposure in smokers' homes (39.6% in 2009 vs 40.0% in 2011; p=0.454). Although a slight decrease in SHS exposure was observed in smoking rooms in hotels, workplaces, restaurants, cafes/bars/nightclubs and amusement parks, SHS continued to be high in those areas. The implementation of smoke-free legislation was accompanied by an increase in antitobacco advertisements.
SHS exposure declines more significantly in full smoking ban places than in partial smoking ban places. The smoke-free policy in public places does not lead to more SHS exposure in homes. Therefore, it is recommended that Guangzhou should implement a 100% smoke-free policy in all public places and workplaces in the future.
广州市于2010年9月1日实施了无烟立法。然而,无烟政策并未覆盖所有室内区域,一些公共场所仍可设置吸烟室。本研究旨在评估不同类型场所及家庭中自我报告的二手烟暴露变化,以评估无烟立法的有效性。
方法/设计:在无烟立法前后对广州市具有代表性的参与者进行重复横断面调查。采用逻辑回归模型检验无烟立法的有效性。
自我报告的二手烟暴露、反烟草广告和烟草广告。
采用多阶段分层设计,共选取了禁令实施前4900名参与者和禁令实施后5135名参与者。
在全面禁烟场所,自我报告的总体二手烟暴露显著下降,从58.8%降至50.3%(p<0.05),文化场所、政府办公室和商业场所下降幅度更大。无烟政策并未改变吸烟者家中的二手烟暴露情况(2009年为39.6%,2011年为40.0%;p=0.454)。尽管在酒店、工作场所、餐馆、咖啡馆/酒吧/夜总会和游乐园的吸烟室中观察到二手烟暴露略有下降,但这些区域的二手烟暴露仍居高不下。无烟立法的实施伴随着反烟草广告的增加。
全面禁烟场所的二手烟暴露下降幅度比部分禁烟场所更大。公共场所的无烟政策不会导致家庭中二手烟暴露增加。因此,建议广州未来应在所有公共场所和工作场所实施100%无烟政策。