• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Building a common pediatric research terminology for accelerating child health research.建立一个通用的儿科研究术语,以加速儿童健康研究。
Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):516-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1504. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Development of a Pediatric Adverse Events Terminology.儿科不良事件术语的制定。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0985.
4
The future of pediatric research.儿科研究的未来。
J Pediatr. 2007 Nov;151(5 Suppl):S21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.016.
5
Future of community pediatric research.社区儿科研究的未来。
Pediatr Ann. 1994 Dec;23(12):669-70, 673-5. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19941201-07.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Pediatric collaborative networks for quality improvement and research.用于质量改进和研究的儿科协作网络。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.07.004.
8
Pediatric collaborative improvement networks: background and overview.儿科合作改进网络:背景与概述。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S189-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786E.
9
10
Electronic Health Record Data Collection Practices to Advance Standardization and Interoperability of Patient Preferences for Interpretation Services: Qualitative Study.推进口译服务患者偏好标准化和互操作性的电子健康记录数据收集实践:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 31;27:e62670. doi: 10.2196/62670.

引用本文的文献

1
The state and future of pediatric research-an introductory overview : The state and future of pediatric research series.儿科研究的现状与未来——概述:儿科研究系列的现状与未来
Pediatr Res. 2023 Jan 24:1-5. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02439-4.
2
Perspectives from the periphery of Paediatrics.儿科学边缘视角。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 6;13:1044692. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044692. eCollection 2022.
3
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Health Information Standards in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review Based on Best Fit Framework Synthesis.影响医疗保健组织采用健康信息标准的因素:基于最佳适配框架综合法的系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 15;8(5):e17334. doi: 10.2196/17334.
4
An Analysis of the Learning Health System in Its First Decade in Practice: Scoping Review.实践首个十年的学习型健康系统分析:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 19;22(3):e17026. doi: 10.2196/17026.
5
What allows a health care system to become a learning health care system: Results from interviews with health system leaders.是什么让医疗保健系统成为一个学习型医疗保健系统:对医疗系统领导者访谈的结果。
Learn Health Syst. 2016 Oct 21;1(1):e10015. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10015. eCollection 2017 Jan.
6
Data Science for Child Health.儿童健康数据科学
J Pediatr. 2019 May;208:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Accelerating drug development for Alzheimer's disease through the use of data standards.通过使用数据标准加速阿尔茨海默病药物研发。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Apr 15;3(2):273-283. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.03.006. eCollection 2017 Jun.
8
Clinimetric properties of lower limb neurological impairment tests for children and young people with a neurological condition: A systematic review.针对患有神经系统疾病的儿童和青少年的下肢神经功能障碍测试的临床测量特性:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180031. eCollection 2017.
9
Big and disparate data: considerations for pediatric consortia.庞大且各异的数据:儿科联盟的考量因素
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Apr;29(2):231-239. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000467.
10
Development of a Pediatric Adverse Events Terminology.儿科不良事件术语的制定。
Pediatrics. 2017 Jan;139(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0985.

本文引用的文献

1
In Search of a Data-in-Once, Electronic Health Record-Linked, Multicenter Registry-How Far We Have Come and How Far We Still Have to Go.寻找一个一次性录入数据、与电子健康记录相关联的多中心注册库——我们已经走了多远以及仍需走多远。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jan 17;1(1):1003. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1003. eCollection 2013.
2
Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012.2001 - 2012年美国门诊医生诊所中电子健康记录系统的使用情况及特点
NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Dec(111):1-8.
3
Exposure to traffic-related air pollution during pregnancy and term low birth weight: estimation of causal associations in a semiparametric model.孕期暴露于交通相关空气污染与足月低出生体重:半参数模型中因果关联的估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 1;176(9):815-24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws148. Epub 2012 Oct 7.
4
Health information technology: standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology, 2014 edition; revisions to the permanent certification program for health information technology. Final rule.《健康信息技术:电子健康记录技术的标准、实施规范及认证标准,2014年版;健康信息技术永久认证计划的修订》。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 4;77(171):54163-292.
5
Implementing the learning health system: from concept to action.实施学习型卫生系统:从理念到行动。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):207-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00012.
6
Conceptualising and creating a global learning health system.概念化和创建一个全球学习健康系统。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Apr;82(4):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).电子数据方法(EDM)论坛用于比较效果研究(CER)。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S7-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257a66b.
8
Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature.构建比较疗效研究(CER)的信息学基础设施:文献回顾。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S38-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259becd.
9
Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.电子临床数据下比较有效性研究(CER)的机遇与挑战:EDM 论坛观点。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S11-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318258530f.
10
Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.临床研究信息学:概念视角。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jun;19(e1):e36-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000968. Epub 2012 Apr 20.

建立一个通用的儿科研究术语,以加速儿童健康研究。

Building a common pediatric research terminology for accelerating child health research.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado;

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2014 Mar;133(3):516-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1504. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-1504
PMID:24534404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3934328/
Abstract

Longitudinal observational clinical data on pediatric patients in electronic format is becoming widely available. A new era of multi-institutional data networks that study pediatric diseases and outcomes across disparate health delivery models and care settings are also enabling an innovative collaborative rapid improvement paradigm called the Learning Health System. However, the potential alignment of routine clinical care, observational clinical research, pragmatic clinical trials, and health systems improvement requires a data infrastructure capable of combining information from systems and workflows that historically have been isolated from each other. Removing barriers to integrating and reusing data collected in different settings will permit new opportunities to develop a more complete picture of a patient's care and to leverage data from related research studies. One key barrier is the lack of a common terminology that provides uniform definitions and descriptions of clinical observations and data. A well-characterized terminology ensures a common meaning and supports data reuse and integration. A common terminology allows studies to build upon previous findings and to reuse data collection tools and data management processes. We present the current state of terminology harmonization and describe a governance structure and mechanism for coordinating the development of a common pediatric research terminology that links to clinical terminologies and can be used to align existing terminologies. By reducing the barriers between clinical care and clinical research, a Learning Health System can leverage and reuse not only its own data resources but also broader extant data resources.

摘要

电子格式的儿科患者纵向观察临床数据正变得广泛可用。新的多机构数据网络时代正在研究儿科疾病和不同医疗服务模式和护理环境下的结果,也正在启用一种名为学习型医疗系统的创新协作快速改进模式。然而,常规临床护理、观察性临床研究、实用临床试验和医疗系统改进的潜在一致性需要一个数据基础设施,能够将来自历史上相互隔离的系统和工作流程的信息结合起来。消除整合和重复使用在不同环境中收集的数据的障碍,将为更全面地了解患者的护理情况并利用相关研究数据提供新的机会。一个关键障碍是缺乏通用术语,该术语为临床观察和数据提供统一的定义和描述。一个特征良好的术语确保了通用含义,并支持数据的重复使用和集成。通用术语允许研究在先前的发现基础上进行,并重复使用数据收集工具和数据管理流程。我们展示了术语协调的现状,并描述了一个治理结构和机制,用于协调开发一个链接到临床术语并可用于对齐现有术语的通用儿科研究术语。通过减少临床护理和临床研究之间的障碍,学习型医疗系统不仅可以利用和重复使用自己的数据资源,还可以利用更广泛的现有数据资源。