Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jun;43(6):897-918. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0095-x. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
Both parents and important non-parental adults have influential roles in promoting positive youth development (PYD). Little research, however, has examined the simultaneous effects of both parents and important non-parental adults for PYD. We assessed the relationships among youth-reported parenting profiles and important non-parental adult relationships in predicting the Five Cs of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, and caring) in four cross-sectional waves of data from the 4-H Study of PYD (Grade 9: N = 975, 61.1% female; Grade 10: N = 1,855, 63.4% female; Grade 11: N = 983, 67.9% female; Grade 12: N = 703, 69.3% female). The results indicated the existence of latent profiles of youth-reported parenting styles based on maternal warmth, parental school involvement, and parental monitoring that were consistent with previously identified profiles (authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and uninvolved) as well as reflecting several novel profiles (highly involved, integrative, school-focused, controlling). Parenting profile membership predicted mean differences in the Five Cs at each wave, and also moderated the relationships between the presence of an important non-parental adult and the Five Cs. In general, authoritative and highly involved parenting predicted higher levels of PYD and a higher likelihood of being connected to an important non-parental adult. We discuss the implications of these findings for future research on adult influences of youth development and for programs that involve adults in attempts to promote PYD.
父母和重要的非父母成年人在促进青少年积极发展(PYD)方面都起着重要作用。然而,很少有研究同时考察父母和重要的非父母成年人对 PYD 的影响。我们评估了青少年报告的父母教养方式和重要的非父母成年人关系在预测 4-H 青少年 PYD 研究(9 年级:N=975,61.1%女性;10 年级:N=1855,63.4%女性;11 年级:N=983,67.9%女性;12 年级:N=703,69.3%女性)四个横断面数据波次中,对 PYD 的五个 C(能力、信心、联系、品格和关爱)的关系。结果表明,根据母亲的温暖、父母对学校的参与度和父母的监督,青少年报告的教养方式存在潜在的模式,这些模式与先前确定的模式(权威型、专制型、放任型和不参与型)一致,也反映了几个新的模式(高度参与型、综合型、以学校为中心型、控制型)。教养模式成员身份预测了每个波次五个 C 的平均差异,也调节了重要的非父母成年人的存在与五个 C 之间的关系。一般来说,权威型和高度参与型的教养方式预测了更高水平的 PYD 以及与重要的非父母成年人建立联系的可能性更高。我们讨论了这些发现对未来研究成人对青少年发展的影响以及涉及成年人试图促进 PYD 的项目的意义。