• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对搜索规律的内隐学习是如何改变你搜索的方式的?

How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

作者信息

McDonnell Gerald P, Mills Mark, McCuller Leslie, Dodd Michael D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA,

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):183-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0546-8. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-014-0546-8
PMID:24558017
Abstract

Individuals are highly sensitive to statistical regularities in their visual environment, even when these patterns do not reach conscious awareness. Here, we examine whether oculomotor behavior is systematically altered when distractor/target configurations rarely repeat, but target location on an initial trial predicts the location of a target on the subsequent trial. The purpose of the current study was to explore whether this temporal-spatial contextual cueing in a conjunction search task influences both reaction time to the target and participant's search strategy. Participants searched for a target through a gaze-contingent window in a display consisting of a large number of distractors, providing a target-present/absent response. Participants were faster to respond to the target on the predicted trial relative to the predictor trial in an implicit contextual cueing task but were no more likely to fixate first to the target quadrant on the predicted trial (Experiment 1). Furthermore, implicit learning was interrupted when instructing participants to vary their searching strategy across trials to eliminate visual scan similarity (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, when participants were explicitly informed that a pattern was present at the start of the experiment, explicit learning was observed in both reaction time and eye movements. The present experiments provide evidence that implicit learning of sequential regularities regarding target locations is not based on learning more efficient scan paths, but is due to some other mechanism.

摘要

个体对其视觉环境中的统计规律高度敏感,即使这些模式并未被有意识地察觉。在此,我们研究当干扰项/目标配置很少重复,但初始试验中的目标位置能预测后续试验中目标的位置时,眼动行为是否会被系统地改变。本研究的目的是探讨在联合搜索任务中的这种时空情境线索是否会影响对目标的反应时间以及参与者的搜索策略。参与者通过注视相关窗口在由大量干扰项组成的显示中搜索目标,并给出目标存在/不存在的反应。在一个内隐情境线索任务中,相对于预测试验,参与者在预测试验中对目标的反应更快,但在预测试验中并不更倾向于首先注视目标象限(实验1)。此外,当指示参与者在各试验中改变其搜索策略以消除视觉扫描相似性时,内隐学习被打断(实验2)。在实验3中,当在实验开始时明确告知参与者存在一种模式时,在反应时间和眼动方面都观察到了外显学习。本实验提供了证据表明,关于目标位置的序列规律的内隐学习并非基于学习更有效的扫描路径,而是由于某种其他机制。

相似文献

1
How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?对搜索规律的内隐学习是如何改变你搜索的方式的?
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):183-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0546-8. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
2
Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.在时空情境线索中,与任务相关的信息会被优先处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2397-2410. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1198-0.
3
Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.学习抑制目标维度中的显著干扰物:基于区域的抑制是持久的,并转移到非目标维度中的干扰物。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2080-2097. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000691. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.注视点眼动支持对偶然习得的视觉搜索模式的识别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Dec;45(12):2147-2164. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000702. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
5
A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.次要任务并不总是代价高昂的:基于上下文的视觉搜索指导可以在受到高要求工作记忆任务干扰的情况下存活下来。
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):381-399. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12346. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000472.
7
Measuring learning and attention to irrelevant distractors in contextual cueing.测量语境线索中的无关分心物的学习和注意。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Sep;50(9):952-970. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001230.
8
Independent operation of implicit working memory under cognitive load.认知负荷下内隐工作记忆的独立运作。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Oct;55:214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
Global statistical learning in a visual search task.在视觉搜索任务中的全局统计学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):152-60. doi: 10.1037/a0026233. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
10
Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal.情境线索即使在引导被认为是最优的情况下也能改善注意力引导。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 May;43(5):926-940. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000394. Epub 2017 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating memory episodes in location probability learning: Can altering response features reset spatial bias?探究位置概率学习中的记忆片段:改变反应特征能否重置空间偏差?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jul;87(5):1518-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03106-6. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Implicit spatial sequential learning facilitates attentional selection in covert visual search. An event-related potentials study.内隐空间序列学习促进隐蔽视觉搜索中的注意选择:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Dec 1;16:974791. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.974791. eCollection 2022.
3
Through the eyes of the beholder: Simulated eye-movement experience ("SEE") modulates valence bias in response to emotional ambiguity.

本文引用的文献

1
Cueing effects of target location probability and repetition.目标位置概率和重复的提示效应。
Vision Res. 2012 Nov 15;73:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
2
Dual-state modulation of the contextual cueing effect: Evidence from eye movement recordings.情境线索效应的双态调制:来自眼动记录的证据。
J Vis. 2012 Jun 8;12(6):11. doi: 10.1167/12.6.11.
3
Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing.空间注意的内隐学习和内源性线索引导。
从观察者的角度来看:模拟眼球运动体验(“SEE”)调节了对情绪模糊性的反应中的效价偏差。
Emotion. 2018 Dec;18(8):1122-1127. doi: 10.1037/emo0000421. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):285-97. doi: 10.1037/a0028022. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
4
Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space.在空间中注意力偏向的快速获得但缓慢消失。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):87-99. doi: 10.1037/a0027611. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
5
Visual scan adaptation during repeated visual search.
J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):4. doi: 10.1167/10.8.4.
6
Spatial probability AIDS visual stimulus discrimination.空间概率性艾滋病视觉刺激辨别
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Aug 6;4. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00063. eCollection 2010.
7
Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search.在现实场景搜索中结合自上而下的过程来引导眼球运动。
J Vis. 2010 Feb 10;10(2):4.1-11. doi: 10.1167/10.2.4.
8
A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.联合搜索中启动效应的特征加权解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):258-72. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.258.
9
Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.新颖性并非总是最佳策略:视任务情况而定的返回抑制和返回促进。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):333-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
10
Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?情境线索是否会引导注意力的分配?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):816-28. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816.