Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street N, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K4, Canada.
Faculty of Business and IT, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street N, Oshawa, Ontario L1H 7K4, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Feb;102:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.033. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
While the "social determinants of health" view compels us to explore how social structures shape health outcomes, it often ignores the role individual agency plays. In contrast, approaches that focus on individual choice and personal responsibility for health often overlook the influence of social structures. Amartya Sen's "capabilities" framework and its derivative the "health capabilities" (HC) approach attempts to accommodate both points of view, acknowledging that individuals function under social conditions over which they have little control, while also acting as agents in their own health and well-being. This paper explores how economic, social, and cultural resources shape the health capability of people with diabetes, focusing specifically on dietary practices. Health capability and agency are central to dietary practices, while also being shaped by immediate and broader social conditions that can generate habits and a lifestyle that constrain dietary behaviors. From January 2011 to December 2012, we interviewed 45 people with diabetes from a primary care clinic in Ontario (Canada) to examine how their economic, social, and cultural resources combine to influence dietary practices relative to their condition. We classified respondents into low, medium, and high resource groups based on economic circumstances, and compared how economic resources, social relationships, health-related knowledge and values combine to enhance or weaken health capability and dietary management. Economic, social, and cultural resources conspired to undermine dietary management among most in the low resource group, whereas social influences significantly influenced diet among many in the medium group. High resource respondents appeared most motivated to maintain a healthy diet, and also had the social and cultural resources to enable them to do so. Understanding the influence of all three types of resources is critical for constructing ways to enhance health capability, chronic disease self-management, and health.
虽然“健康的社会决定因素”观点促使我们探讨社会结构如何塑造健康结果,但它常常忽略了个体能动性所起的作用。相比之下,关注个人选择和个人对健康的责任的方法往往忽视了社会结构的影响。阿玛蒂亚·森(Amartya Sen)的“能力”框架及其衍生的“健康能力”(HC)方法试图兼顾这两种观点,承认个人在他们几乎无法控制的社会条件下运作,同时也作为自己健康和福祉的代理人。本文探讨了经济、社会和文化资源如何塑造糖尿病患者的健康能力,特别关注饮食实践。健康能力和能动性是饮食实践的核心,同时也受到直接和更广泛的社会条件的影响,这些条件会产生习惯和生活方式,限制饮食行为。从 2011 年 1 月到 2012 年 12 月,我们采访了安大略省(加拿大)一家初级保健诊所的 45 名糖尿病患者,以研究他们的经济、社会和文化资源如何结合起来影响与病情相关的饮食实践。我们根据经济状况将受访者分为低、中、高资源组,并比较了经济资源、社会关系、与健康相关的知识和价值观如何结合起来增强或削弱健康能力和饮食管理。经济、社会和文化资源共同破坏了大多数低资源组的饮食管理,而社会影响在很大程度上影响了许多中资源组的饮食。高资源受访者似乎最有动力保持健康的饮食,并且也拥有社会和文化资源来实现这一目标。理解这三种类型资源的影响对于构建增强健康能力、慢性病自我管理和健康的方法至关重要。