Suppr超能文献

经前额皮质 tDCS 和高频经颅交流电刺激对第一人称和第三人称视频片段引发的正性和负性情绪处理的影响。

The effects of prefrontal tDCS and hf-tRNS on the processing of positive and negative emotions evoked by video clips in first- and third-person.

机构信息

Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 31, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):8064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58702-7.

Abstract

The causal role of the cerebral hemispheres in positive and negative emotion processing remains uncertain. The Right Hemisphere Hypothesis proposes right hemispheric superiority for all emotions, while the Valence Hypothesis suggests the left/right hemisphere's primary involvement in positive/negative emotions, respectively. To address this, emotional video clips were presented during dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) electrical stimulation, incorporating a comparison of tDCS and high frequency tRNS stimulation techniques and manipulating perspective-taking (first-person vs third-person Point of View, POV). Four stimulation conditions were applied while participants were asked to rate emotional video valence: anodal/cathodal tDCS to the left/right DLPFC, reverse configuration (anodal/cathodal on the right/left DLPFC), bilateral hf-tRNS, and sham (control condition). Results revealed significant interactions between stimulation setup, emotional valence, and POV, implicating the DLPFC in emotions and perspective-taking. The right hemisphere played a crucial role in both positive and negative valence, supporting the Right Hemisphere Hypothesis. However, the complex interactions between the brain hemispheres and valence also supported the Valence Hypothesis. Both stimulation techniques (tDCS and tRNS) significantly modulated results. These findings support both hypotheses regarding hemispheric involvement in emotions, underscore the utility of video stimuli, and emphasize the importance of perspective-taking in this field, which is often overlooked.

摘要

大脑半球在正性和负性情绪处理中的因果作用仍不确定。右半球假说提出右半球对所有情绪都具有优势,而效价假说则提出左/右半球主要参与正/负性情绪。为了解决这个问题,在背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)电刺激期间呈现情感视频剪辑,同时比较 tDCS 和高频 tRNS 刺激技术,并操纵观点采择(第一人称与第三人称视角,POV)。当参与者被要求对情感视频效价进行评分时,应用了四种刺激条件:左/右 DLPFC 的阳极/阴极 tDCS、反转配置(右/左 DLPFC 的阳极/阴极)、双侧高频 tRNS 和假刺激(对照条件)。结果显示刺激设置、情绪效价和 POV 之间存在显著的相互作用,提示 DLPFC 在情绪和观点采择中发挥作用。右半球在正性和负性效价中都起着关键作用,支持右半球假说。然而,大脑半球之间的复杂相互作用以及效价也支持了效价假说。两种刺激技术(tDCS 和 tRNS)都显著调节了结果。这些发现支持了关于情绪涉及大脑半球的两种假说,强调了视频刺激的效用,并强调了在这个领域中经常被忽视的观点采择的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f94/10997595/f892829a6bc9/41598_2024_58702_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验