De Carolis Elena, Hensgens Lambert A M, Vella Antonietta, Posteraro Brunella, Sanguinetti Maurizio, Senesi Sonia, Tavanti Arianna
Istituto di Microbiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Med Mycol. 2014 Feb;52(2):123-30. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myt009. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
In this study we compare the capability of amplification fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to identify and subtype isolates of members of the Candida parapsilosis complex (C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsilosis) and Lodderomyces elongisporus, which cannot be differentiated with biochemical methods. Both techniques correctly identified all isolates included in this study and clustered isolates within the different species. DNA-based and mass spectrum-based dendrograms yielded similar outcomes with regard to phylogenetic distance within C. orthopsilosis and C. parapsilosis species. However, a different clustering was obtained for C. metapsilosis for which AFLP was highly effective in differentiating. While MALDI-TOF MS was found to be a reliable method for species-level identification, further studies are required to assess its value as a fungal typing tool.
在本研究中,我们比较了扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)和基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定近平滑念珠菌复合体(近平滑念珠菌、正平滑念珠菌、副平滑念珠菌)及长孢洛德酵母成员的分离株并进行亚型分类的能力,这些菌株无法通过生化方法进行区分。两种技术均正确鉴定了本研究中包含的所有分离株,并将不同物种内的分离株聚类。基于DNA的树状图和基于质谱的树状图在正平滑念珠菌和近平滑念珠菌物种内的系统发育距离方面产生了相似的结果。然而,对于副平滑念珠菌,获得了不同的聚类结果,AFLP在区分该菌方面非常有效。虽然MALDI-TOF MS被认为是一种可靠的物种水平鉴定方法,但仍需要进一步研究以评估其作为真菌分型工具的价值。