Saitta Daniela, Ferro Giancarlo Antonio, Polosa Riccardo
Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Department of Law, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014 Mar;5(2):50-61. doi: 10.1177/2040622314521271.
A growing body of scientific studies show that e-cigarettes may serve as an acceptable substitute for smoking tobacco cigarettes, thereby reducing or eliminating exposure to harmful elements in smoke. The success of e-cigarettes is such that sales of these products are rapidly gaining on traditional cigarettes. The rapidly evolving phenomenon is raising concerns for the health community, pharmaceutical industry, health regulators and state governments. Obviously, these products need to be adequately regulated, primarily to protect users. Depending on the form and intended scope, certain regulatory decisions may have diverse unintended consequences on public health and may face many different challenges. Ideally, before any regulations are enacted, the regulatory body will require sufficient scientific research to verify that a problem does exist, quantify the problem, explore all potential solutions including making no change at all, determine the possible consequences of each, and then select the solution that is best for public health. Here we present an overview on the existing and deeming regulatory decisions for electronic cigarettes. We challenge them, based on the mounting scientific evidence with the ultimate goal of proposing appropriate recommendations while minimizing potential unintended consequences of ill-informed regulation.
越来越多的科学研究表明,电子烟可能是吸烟的一种可接受替代品,从而减少或消除对烟雾中有害物质的接触。电子烟的成功之处在于,这些产品的销量正在迅速逼近传统香烟。这种迅速演变的现象引发了健康界、制药行业、健康监管机构和州政府的担忧。显然,这些产品需要得到充分监管,主要是为了保护使用者。根据形式和预期范围,某些监管决定可能会对公众健康产生各种意想不到的后果,并可能面临许多不同的挑战。理想情况下,在颁布任何法规之前,监管机构将需要充分的科学研究来验证问题确实存在、量化问题、探索所有潜在解决方案(包括完全不做改变)、确定每种方案可能产生的后果,然后选择最有利于公众健康的解决方案。在此,我们概述了电子烟现有的和认定的监管决定。基于越来越多的科学证据,我们对这些决定提出质疑,最终目标是提出适当建议,同时尽量减少因信息不足的监管而产生的潜在意外后果。