Parker Trent M, Burns Lori A, Parrish Robert M, Ryno Alden G, Sherrill C David
Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, USA.
J Chem Phys. 2014 Mar 7;140(9):094106. doi: 10.1063/1.4867135.
A systematic examination of the computational expense and accuracy of Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) for the prediction of non-covalent interaction energies is provided with respect to both method [SAPT0, DFT-SAPT, SAPT2, SAPT2+, SAPT2+(3), and SAPT2+3; with and without CCD dispersion for the last three] and basis set [Dunning cc-pVDZ through aug-cc-pV5Z wherever computationally tractable, including truncations of diffuse basis functions]. To improve accuracy for hydrogen-bonded systems, we also include two corrections based on exchange-scaling (sSAPT0) and the supermolecular MP2 interaction energy (δMP2). When considering the best error performance relative to computational effort, we recommend as the gold, silver, and bronze standard of SAPT: SAPT2+(3)δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ, SAPT2+/aug-cc-pVDZ, and sSAPT0/jun-cc-pVDZ. Their respective mean absolute errors in interaction energy across the S22, HBC6, NBC10, and HSG databases are 0.15 (62.9), 0.30 (4.4), and 0.49 kcal mol(-1) (0.03 h for adenine·thymine complex).
针对非共价相互作用能预测的对称适配微扰理论(SAPT)的计算成本和准确性,我们进行了系统研究,涉及方法[SAPT0、DFT-SAPT、SAPT2、SAPT2 +、SAPT2+(3)和SAPT2 + 3;后三种方法有或没有耦合簇双激发(CCD)色散校正]和基组[在计算可行的情况下,从邓宁cc-pVDZ到aug-cc-pV5Z,包括漫射基函数的截断]。为提高氢键体系的准确性,我们还纳入了基于交换标度(sSAPT0)和超分子MP2相互作用能(δMP2)的两种校正。在考虑相对于计算量的最佳误差性能时,我们推荐作为SAPT的金、银和青铜标准:SAPT2+(3)δMP2/aug-cc-pVTZ、SAPT2+/aug-cc-pVDZ和sSAPT0/jun-cc-pVDZ。它们在S22、HBC6、NBC10和HSG数据库中相互作用能的各自平均绝对误差分别为0.15(62.9)、0.30(4.4)和0.49千卡·摩尔⁻¹(腺嘌呤·胸腺嘧啶复合物为0.03小时)。