• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neural division of labor in reading is constrained by culture: a training study of reading Chinese characters.阅读中的神经分工受文化限制:一项汉字阅读的训练研究
Cortex. 2014 Apr;53:90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
2
Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.第一语言为字母文字系统的汉语第二语言学习者在汉字加工中次词汇语音通达的电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Apr;16(2):339-52. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0394-z.
3
Orthographic learning via self-teaching in Chinese: The roles of phonological recoding, context, and phonetic and semantic radicals.汉字正字法自学:语音转写、语境及声符和意符的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;199:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104913. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.书写影响汉语阅读的脑网络:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1670-84. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22017. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
5
Reading depends on writing, in Chinese.阅读依赖于写作,用中文来说。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 14;102(24):8781-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503523102. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
6
The Neural Correlates of the Interaction between Semantic and Phonological Processing for Chinese Character Reading.汉字阅读中语义与语音加工交互作用的神经关联
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 23;7:947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00947. eCollection 2016.
7
Functional and anatomical dissociation between the orthographic lexicon and the orthographic buffer revealed in reading and writing Chinese characters by fMRI.功能磁共振成像显示在读写汉字过程中,正字法词汇库与正字法缓冲器之间的功能和解剖学分离。
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 1;129:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Similar alterations in brain function for phonological and semantic processing to visual characters in Chinese dyslexia.中文阅读障碍者在语音和语义处理以及对视觉字符处理方面大脑功能的相似改变。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
9
Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading.汉语词汇阅读中语音和语义加工的神经认知网络的发展差异
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):797-809. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20546.
10
A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing.一项关于汉字正字法、语音和语义加工的 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Connectome-based predictive modeling of handwriting and reading using task-evoked and resting-state functional connectivity.基于连接组的手写和阅读预测模型,使用任务诱发和静息态功能连接。
iScience. 2025 Jul 7;28(8):113075. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113075. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
2
The phonological congruency modulated long-term form priming of Chinese characters.语音一致性调节了汉字的长期形态启动。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):312-333. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01462-y. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Intersecting distributed networks support convergent linguistic functioning across different languages in bilinguals.交叉分布网络支持双语者在不同语言中 convergent 语言功能(convergent linguistic functioning)的汇聚。
Commun Biol. 2023 Jan 25;6(1):99. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04446-5.
4
The Brain Connectome for Chinese Reading.中文阅读的脑连接组
Neurosci Bull. 2022 Sep;38(9):1097-1113. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00864-3. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Atypical Relationships Between Neurofunctional Features of Print-Sound Integration and Reading Abilities in Chinese Children With Dyslexia.中国阅读障碍儿童中印刷体-语音整合的神经功能特征与阅读能力之间的非典型关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:748644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748644. eCollection 2021.
6
Morphological processing in Chinese engages left temporal regions.汉语形态加工涉及左侧颞叶区域。
Brain Lang. 2019 Dec;199:104696. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104696. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
The neural basis of semantic cognition in Mandarin Chinese: A combined fMRI and TMS study.汉语语义认知的神经基础:一项 fMRI 和 TMS 的联合研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 15;40(18):5412-5423. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24781. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
8
Long-term Chinese calligraphic handwriting reshapes the posterior cingulate cortex: A VBM study.长期汉字书法练习重塑后扣带皮层:一项基于体素的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214917. eCollection 2019.
9
Modulating Effects of Contextual Emotions on the Neural Plasticity Induced by Word Learning.情境情绪对单词学习诱导的神经可塑性的调节作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Nov 23;12:464. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00464. eCollection 2018.
10
Alterations in white matter pathways underlying phonological and morphological processing in Chinese developmental dyslexia.中文发展性阅读障碍中语音和形态处理相关的白质通路改变。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;31:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling.正字法对学习中文和英文时分工的影响:来自计算建模的见解。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2013 Apr;16(Spec Iss 2):354-366. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000296.
2
Segregating Semantic from Phonological Processes during Reading.阅读过程中语义与语音加工的分离。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):727-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.727.
3
Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.认知模型能否解释单词和伪词阅读时大脑的激活?36 项神经影像学研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):766-91. doi: 10.1037/a0030266. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Connectionism and the Role of Morphology in Visual Word Recognition.联结主义与词法在视觉单词识别中的作用
Ment Lex. 2010 Jan 1;5(3):371-400. doi: 10.1075/ml.5.3.07rue.
5
Towards a universal model of reading.朝向阅读的通用模型。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Oct;35(5):263-79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001841. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
6
A meta-analysis of fMRI studies on Chinese orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing.一项关于汉字正字法、语音和语义加工的 fMRI 研究的荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.047. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
7
Similar alterations in brain function for phonological and semantic processing to visual characters in Chinese dyslexia.中文阅读障碍者在语音和语义处理以及对视觉字符处理方面大脑功能的相似改变。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.汉语单音节词语音识别的时间进程:来自 ERP 分析的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.054. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
9
Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences.中英语人群中的发展性阅读障碍:将阅读障碍的影响与语言差异区分开来。
Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1694-706. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq106. Epub 2010 May 20.
10
Neural systems for reading aloud: a multiparametric approach.朗读的神经机制:一种多参数方法。
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Aug;20(8):1799-815. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp245. Epub 2009 Nov 17.

阅读中的神经分工受文化限制:一项汉字阅读的训练研究

Neural division of labor in reading is constrained by culture: a training study of reading Chinese characters.

作者信息

Zhao Jingjing, Wang Xiaoyi, Frost Stephen J, Sun Wan, Fang Shin-Yi, Mencl W Einar, Pugh Kenneth R, Shu Hua, Rueckl Jay G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.

State Key Laboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Cortex. 2014 Apr;53:90-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.003
PMID:24607883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4013681/
Abstract

Word reading in alphabetic language involves a cortical system with multiple components whose division of labor depends on the transparency of the writing system. To gain insight about the neural division of labor between phonology and semantics subserving word reading in Chinese, a deep non-alphabetic writing system, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate the effects of phonological and semantic training on the cortical circuitry for oral naming of Chinese characters. In a training study, we examined whether a training task that differentially focused readers' attention on the phonological or semantic properties of a Chinese character changes the patterns of cortical activation that was evoked by that character in a subsequent naming task. Our imaging results corroborate that the cortical regions underlying reading in Chinese largely overlap the left-hemisphere reading system responsible for reading in alphabetic languages, with some cortical regions in the left-hemisphere uniquely recruited for reading in Chinese. However, in contrast to findings from studies of English word naming, we observed considerable overlap in the neural activation patterns associated with phonological and semantic training on naming Chinese characters, which we suggest may reflect a balanced neural division of labor between phonology and semantics in Chinese character reading. The equitable division of labor for Chinese reading might be driven by the special statistical structure of the writing system, which includes equally systematic mappings in the correspondences between written forms and their pronunciations and meanings.

摘要

字母语言中的单词阅读涉及一个具有多个组成部分的皮质系统,其分工取决于书写系统的透明度。为了深入了解在中文这种深度非字母书写系统中,服务于单词阅读的语音和语义之间的神经分工,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来研究语音和语义训练对汉字口语命名皮质回路的影响。在一项训练研究中,我们考察了一项训练任务,该任务使读者的注意力有差异地集中在汉字的语音或语义属性上,是否会改变该汉字在随后命名任务中所诱发的皮质激活模式。我们的成像结果证实,中文阅读所涉及的皮质区域在很大程度上与负责字母语言阅读的左半球阅读系统重叠,左半球的一些皮质区域专门用于中文阅读。然而,与英语单词命名研究的结果不同,我们观察到与汉字命名的语音和语义训练相关的神经激活模式有相当大的重叠,我们认为这可能反映了汉字阅读中语音和语义之间平衡的神经分工。中文阅读这种公平的分工可能是由书写系统的特殊统计结构驱动的,该结构包括书写形式与其发音和意义之间同样系统的映射。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/14044722c0cb/nihms574005f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/93e465f6a4be/nihms574005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/9ba47f003e2c/nihms574005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/96a813e43290/nihms574005f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/33715e04053e/nihms574005f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/49b7347ab388/nihms574005f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/2bbbfc701a91/nihms574005f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/14044722c0cb/nihms574005f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/93e465f6a4be/nihms574005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/9ba47f003e2c/nihms574005f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/96a813e43290/nihms574005f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/33715e04053e/nihms574005f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/49b7347ab388/nihms574005f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/2bbbfc701a91/nihms574005f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6030/4013681/14044722c0cb/nihms574005f7.jpg