Cular Drazen, Krstulović Sasa, Katić Ratko, Primorac Dragan, Vucić Darko
University of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia.
Penn State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Coll Antropol. 2013 Dec;37(4):1267-74.
The aim of this research was to determine the order and importance of particular fitness status variables impact on success in taekwondo according to opinions of top taekwondo instructors (experts). Partial objectives included analysis of metric characteristics of the measuring instrument, and determining differences between two disciplines (sparring and technical discipline of patterns) and two competition systems (WTF and ITF). In accordance with the aims, the research was conducted on a subject sample which consisted of 730 taekwondo instructors from 6 continents and from 69 countries (from which we selected 242 instructors), who are at different success levels in both taekwondo competition systems (styles) and two taekwondo disciplines. The respondents were divided into 3 qualitative subsamples using a dependent variable of the instructor's accomplished results. In 6 languages, they electronically evaluated, in percentage value (%), the impact of 8 motor and functional abilities: specific strength (STR), flexibility (FLX), specific endurance (END), speed (SPE), balance (BAL), coordination (COO), agility (AGI) and accuracy (ACC). The analysis of metric characteristics of the constructed instrument showed a satisfactory degree of agreement (IIr) which is proportional to the level of respondent quality, i.e. it grows along with the increase in instructor quality in all analyzed disciplines of both systems. According to the obtained results, speed and specific endurance were ranked as the abilities which are most important for success in the sparring discipline in both competition systems (WTF and ITF), whose instructors also expressed a higher level of agreement in relation of speed and success in the technical disciplines.
本研究的目的是根据顶级跆拳道教练(专家)的意见,确定特定体能状况变量对跆拳道比赛成功的影响顺序和重要性。部分目标包括分析测量工具的度量特征,以及确定两个项目(竞技和品势技术项目)和两种竞赛体系(世界跆拳道联盟(WTF)和国际跆拳道联合会(ITF))之间的差异。根据研究目的,对来自六大洲69个国家的730名跆拳道教练(从中选取242名教练)组成的样本进行了研究,这些教练在两种跆拳道竞赛体系(风格)和两个跆拳道项目中处于不同的成功水平。根据教练取得的成绩这一因变量,将受访者分为3个定性子样本。他们用6种语言,以百分比(%)的形式对8种运动和功能能力的影响进行了电子评估:专项力量(STR)、柔韧性(FLX)、专项耐力(END)、速度(SPE)、平衡(BAL)、协调性(COO)、敏捷性(AGI)和准确性(ACC)。对所构建工具的度量特征分析表明,一致性程度(IIr)令人满意,且与受访者质量水平成正比,即在两种体系的所有分析项目中,随着教练质量的提高而增加。根据所得结果可知,速度和专项耐力被列为在两种竞赛体系(WTF和ITF)的竞技项目中对成功最为重要的能力,这两种体系的教练在速度与技术项目成功之间的关系上也表现出更高程度的一致性。