• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业景观中的生态系统服务:一种支持可持续土壤管理的空间明确方法。

Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: a spatially explicit approach to support sustainable soil management.

作者信息

Forouzangohar Mohsen, Crossman Neville D, MacEwan Richard J, Wallace D Dugal, Bennett Lauren T

机构信息

Department of Forest and Ecosystem Science, The University of Melbourne, 4 Water Street, Creswick, VIC 3363, Australia.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Ecosystem Sciences, PMB 2, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 30;2014:483298. doi: 10.1155/2014/483298. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1155/2014/483298
PMID:24616632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925562/
Abstract

Soil degradation has been associated with a lack of adequate consideration of soil ecosystem services. We demonstrate a broadly applicable method for mapping changes in the supply of two priority soil ecosystem services to support decisions about sustainable land-use configurations. We used a landscape-scale study area of 302 km(2) in northern Victoria, south-eastern Australia, which has been cleared for intensive agriculture. Indicators representing priority soil services (soil carbon sequestration and soil water storage) were quantified and mapped under both a current and a future 25-year land-use scenario (the latter including a greater diversity of land uses and increased perennial crops and irrigation). We combined diverse methods, including soil analysis using mid-infrared spectroscopy, soil biophysical modelling, and geostatistical interpolation. Our analysis suggests that the future land-use scenario would increase the landscape-level supply of both services over 25 years. Soil organic carbon content and water storage to 30 cm depth were predicted to increase by about 11% and 22%, respectively. Our service maps revealed the locations of hotspots, as well as potential trade-offs in service supply under new land-use configurations. The study highlights the need to consider diverse land uses in sustainable management of soil services in changing agricultural landscapes.

摘要

土壤退化与对土壤生态系统服务缺乏充分考虑有关。我们展示了一种广泛适用的方法,用于绘制两种优先土壤生态系统服务供给的变化情况,以支持有关可持续土地利用配置的决策。我们在澳大利亚东南部维多利亚州北部一个面积为302平方公里的景观尺度研究区域开展了研究,该区域已被开垦用于集约化农业。在当前和未来25年土地利用情景下(后者包括更多样化的土地利用方式以及多年生作物和灌溉面积增加),对代表优先土壤服务的指标(土壤碳固存和土壤储水)进行了量化和制图。我们综合运用了多种方法,包括利用中红外光谱进行土壤分析、土壤生物物理建模和地质统计学插值。我们的分析表明,未来土地利用情景将在25年内增加这两种服务的景观层面供给。预计土壤有机碳含量和30厘米深度的储水量将分别增加约11%和22%。我们的服务地图揭示了热点区域的位置,以及新土地利用配置下服务供给中的潜在权衡。该研究强调了在不断变化的农业景观中,可持续管理土壤服务时考虑多样化土地利用的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/007246713782/TSWJ2014-483298.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/45221cec601f/TSWJ2014-483298.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/fb3756ab5e07/TSWJ2014-483298.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/e27161f012b7/TSWJ2014-483298.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/007246713782/TSWJ2014-483298.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/45221cec601f/TSWJ2014-483298.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/fb3756ab5e07/TSWJ2014-483298.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/e27161f012b7/TSWJ2014-483298.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfb/3925562/007246713782/TSWJ2014-483298.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: a spatially explicit approach to support sustainable soil management.农业景观中的生态系统服务:一种支持可持续土壤管理的空间明确方法。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Jan 30;2014:483298. doi: 10.1155/2014/483298. eCollection 2014.
2
Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape.情景展示了在农业景观中维持未来生态系统服务的途径。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Jan;28(1):119-134. doi: 10.1002/eap.1633. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
Analyzing Land-Use Change Scenarios for Ecosystem Services and their Trade-Offs in the Ecological Conservation Area in Beijing, China.分析中国北京生态保护区的土地利用变化情景及其生态系统服务的权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8632. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228632.
4
Integrating ecosystem services trade-offs with paddy land-to-dry land decisions: A scenario approach in Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China.将生态系统服务权衡与稻田到旱地决策相结合:以中国西南洱海流域为例的情景方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:849-860. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.340. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
[Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service synergy and trade-off in Qinling Mountains, China].[中国秦岭地区生态系统服务协同与权衡的时空变化]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Aug;33(8):2057-2067. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202208.019.
6
Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China.中国鄱阳湖地区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空格局
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Mar;30(3):995-1004. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.005.
7
Land use efficiency: anticipating future demand for land-sector greenhouse gas emissions abatement and managing trade-offs with agriculture, water, and biodiversity.土地利用效率:预测土地部门温室气体减排的未来需求,并管理与农业、水和生物多样性的权衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Nov;21(11):4098-114. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13020. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
Changes in land-uses and ecosystem services under multi-scenarios simulation.多情景模拟下的土地利用和生态系统服务变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:522-526. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
9
Land degradation neutrality: Testing the indicator in a temperate agricultural landscape.土地退化中性:在温带农业景观中测试指标。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 15;346:118884. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118884. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
10
Trade-offs in water and carbon ecosystem services with land-use changes in grasslands.草原土地利用变化对水和碳生态系统服务的权衡。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1633-1644. doi: 10.1890/15-0863.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation.保护生态系统服务的空间优先级划分:热点地区与启发式优化方法的比较
Landsc Ecol. 2016;31:431-450. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0258-5. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
2
Ecosystem Services Flows: Why Stakeholders' Power Relationships Matter.生态系统服务流动:利益相关者权力关系为何重要。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0132232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132232. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Kriging for estimating spatial pattern of contaminants: Potential and problems.克里金法估计污染物空间格局:潜力与问题。
Environ Monit Assess. 1985 Jun;5(2):113-35. doi: 10.1007/BF00395842.
2
Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses.景观对生物多样性格局和过程的调节作用——八个假说。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Aug;87(3):661-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
3
Mapping the organic carbon stocks of surface soils using local spatial interpolator.利用局部空间插值法绘制表层土壤有机碳储量图。
J Environ Monit. 2011 Nov;13(11):3128-35. doi: 10.1039/c1em10520e. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
4
How to calculate the spatial distribution of ecosystem services--natural attenuation as example from The Netherlands.如何计算生态系统服务的空间分布——以荷兰为例的自然衰减。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jan 15;415:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.058. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
5
A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms.一种从土壤属性、利益相关者和四个耕地农场的数据中评估生态系统服务的方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jan 15;415:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
6
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.理解多种生态系统服务之间的关系。
Ecol Lett. 2009 Dec;12(12):1394-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
7
Direct comparison between visible near- and mid-infrared spectroscopy for describing diuron sorption in soils.用于描述土壤中敌草隆吸附的可见近红外光谱与中红外光谱的直接比较
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jun 1;43(11):4049-55. doi: 10.1021/es8029945.
8
Midinfrared spectroscopy and chemometrics to predict diuron sorption coefficients in soils.中红外光谱法和化学计量学用于预测土壤中敌草隆的吸附系数。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 May 1;42(9):3283-8. doi: 10.1021/es702750d.
9
The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation.农业基质与保护的未来范式。
Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):274-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00582.x.
10
Ecology. Managing soil carbon.生态学。管理土壤碳。
Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):393. doi: 10.1126/science.1093079.