• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚社区药剂师对药物不良反应报告的态度、看法和障碍:定量分析。

Community pharmacists' attitudes, perceptions, and barriers toward adverse drug reaction reporting in Malaysia: a quantitative insight.

机构信息

From the *Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, Kuantan; †Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia; and ‡College of pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2014 Jun;10(2):81-7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000051.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000051
PMID:24618640
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to explore awareness and attitudes of community pharmacists toward the national ADR reporting system activities in the northern states of Malaysia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey using a validated self-administered questionnaire was used in this study. The questionnaire was delivered to all community pharmacists (N = 470) practicing in the four northern states of Malaysia (Perlis, Kedah, Pulau Pinang and Perak) during the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 470 survey forms were sent with one wave of reminders. Only 116 pharmacists responded to the survey (response rate of 25.2%). The total number of usable responses was 104 (24.7%). The survey findings revealed that nearly three-quarters of pharmacists (n = 75; 72.1%) were not aware of the pharmacovigilance activities run by the drug regulatory authority in Malaysia. Although more than half (n = 65, 61.5%) of the surveyed pharmacists emphasized the importance of ADR reporting, only 13 pharmacists (12.9%) claimed that they submitted ADR reports to the Malaysia Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (MADRAC) before this survey. Barriers which prevent community pharmacists from ADR reporting were identified. These included lack of knowledge on how to report (n = 36; 34.7%), the unavailability of reporting forms (n = 44; 42.6%), and ignorance of where the report should be sent to (n = 46; 44.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the unfamiliarity and the common misconceptions, the study results show that community pharmacists in the northern states of Malaysia have a very positive attitude toward the ADR reporting system in the country. However, the study findings highlight the urgent need for special education programs to establish continuous efforts to promote ADR reporting among community pharmacists. Further studies at the national level aimed at identifying and removing barriers that prevent community pharmacists from performing ADR reporting are required.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨马来西亚北部各州社区药剂师对国家不良反应报告系统活动的认知和态度。

方法

本研究采用了经过验证的自填式问卷进行横断面调查。在研究期间,向马来西亚北部四个州(玻璃市、吉打、槟城和霹雳)的所有社区药剂师(N=470)分发了问卷。

结果

共发出 470 份问卷,并进行了一轮提醒。只有 116 名药剂师对调查做出回应(回应率为 25.2%)。可使用的有效回复总数为 104 份(24.7%)。调查结果显示,近四分之三的药剂师(n=75;72.1%)不知道马来西亚药品监管机构开展的药物警戒活动。尽管超过一半(n=65,61.5%)的被调查药剂师强调不良反应报告的重要性,但在此调查之前,只有 13 名药剂师(12.9%)声称他们向马来西亚不良反应药物咨询委员会(MADRAC)提交了不良反应报告。确定了阻碍社区药剂师进行不良反应报告的障碍。这些障碍包括缺乏报告方法的知识(n=36;34.7%)、缺乏报告表(n=44;42.6%)和不知道报告应寄往何处(n=46;44.6%)。

结论

尽管不熟悉和普遍存在误解,但研究结果表明,马来西亚北部各州的社区药剂师对该国的不良反应报告系统持非常积极的态度。然而,研究结果强调,迫切需要开展特别教育计划,以促使社区药剂师持续努力进行不良反应报告。需要在全国范围内开展进一步的研究,以确定和消除阻碍社区药剂师进行不良反应报告的障碍。

相似文献

1
Community pharmacists' attitudes, perceptions, and barriers toward adverse drug reaction reporting in Malaysia: a quantitative insight.马来西亚社区药剂师对药物不良反应报告的态度、看法和障碍:定量分析。
J Patient Saf. 2014 Jun;10(2):81-7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000051.
2
Medication safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among community pharmacists in Lebanon.黎巴嫩社区药剂师的用药安全知识、态度与实践
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jan;34(1):149-156. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1361916. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Community pharmacists' views on adverse drug reactions reporting in Malaysia: a pilot study.马来西亚社区药剂师对药品不良反应报告的看法:一项试点研究。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Jun;32(3):339-42. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9382-0. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
4
Pharmacists' attitudes toward adverse drug reaction reporting in Hong Kong.香港药剂师对药物不良反应报告的态度。
Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Dec;28(12):1400-3. doi: 10.1177/106002809402801213.
5
Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes Toward Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting Process Among Health Care Providers in Dammam, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯达曼医疗保健人员对药物警戒及药品不良反应报告流程的知识、实践与态度
Curr Drug Saf. 2018;13(1):21-25. doi: 10.2174/1574886313666171218123802.
6
Hospital pharmacists' knowledge and opinions regarding adverse drug reaction reporting in Northern China.中国北方地区医院药师对药品不良反应报告的认知和看法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Mar;19(3):217-22. doi: 10.1002/pds.1792.
7
Cross-sectional study exploring barriers to adverse drug reactions reporting in community pharmacy settings in Dhaka, Bangladesh.横断面研究探索孟加拉国达卡社区药房环境中药物不良反应报告障碍。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e010912. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010912.
8
Factors associated with the intention of community pharmacists to report adverse drug reactions to regulatory authority in Malaysia: application of the theory of planned behaviour.与马来西亚社区药剂师向监管机构报告药物不良反应的意愿相关的因素:计划行为理论的应用。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2021 Oct 18;29(5):435-442. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riab036.
9
Factors that influence under-reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions among community pharmacists in a Spanish region.西班牙某地区社区药剂师对疑似药物不良反应报告不足的影响因素。
Drug Saf. 2007;30(11):1073-82. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730110-00006.
10
Influence of pharmacists' attitudes on adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.药剂师态度对药品不良反应报告的影响:葡萄牙的一项病例对照研究
Drug Saf. 2006;29(4):331-40. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629040-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Pharmacists' Perspectives on Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Developed and Developing Countries: A Comparative Pilot Study.发达国家与发展中国家医院药剂师对药品不良反应报告的看法:一项比较性试点研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;13(4):103. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13040103.
2
Pharmacists' Experiences on Adverse Drug Reactions in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯药剂师对药物不良反应的经验:一项横断面研究。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;13(3):87. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13030087.
3
Trends in adverse drug reaction reporting in eight selected countries after the implementation of new pharmacovigilance regulation in 2012: a joinpoint regression analysis.
2012年实施新的药物警戒法规后八个选定国家药物不良反应报告的趋势:一项Joinpoint回归分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03862-2.
4
Factors Associated with the Public's Intention to Report Adverse Drug Reactions to Community Pharmacists in the Makkah Region of Saudi Arabia: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.沙特阿拉伯麦加地区公众向社区药剂师报告药品不良反应意愿的相关因素:计划行为理论的应用
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Dec 11;18:2495-2506. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S495487. eCollection 2024.
5
A Survey of Pharmacists and Other Healthcare Professionals in Vietnam: Factors Influencing Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions.越南药剂师及其他医疗保健专业人员调查:影响药品不良反应报告知识与态度的因素
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Feb;59(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/00185787231186506. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update.与医疗保健专业人员报告药物不良反应不足相关的因素:系统评价更新。
Drug Saf. 2023 Jul;46(7):625-636. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01302-7. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
Pharmacists' experiences on adverse drug reaction: 10 years later.药剂师关于药物不良反应的经历:十年之后。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 29;13:932942. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.932942. eCollection 2022.
8
Community pharmacists' counseling practices and patient experiences about topical corticosteroids - an online survey in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.社区药剂师关于局部皮质类固醇的咨询实践和患者体验 - 马来西亚巴生谷的在线调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Oct 15;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01871-z.
9
Instruments to assess the role of the clinical pharmacist: a systematic review.评估临床药师作用的工具:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;11(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02031-1.
10
Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.影响社区药房创新在国家层面实施的因素:应用实施研究综合框架进行的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 4;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0867-5.