Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014 Jun;33(6):1415-26. doi: 10.1002/etc.2576. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
Relationships between persistent organic pollutant (POP) levels and age in wildlife biomonitoring are often interpreted as changes in contaminant burden as organisms age. However, cross-sectional body burden-age trends (CBATs) obtained from biomonitoring studies, which sample individuals of different ages at the same time, should not be confused with longitudinal body burden-age trends (LBATs) obtained by sampling the same individuals repeatedly through time. To clarify how CBATs and LBATs for wildlife species deviate from each other, and describe any impact of lifespan and sex, we used mechanistic bioaccumulation models to estimate historic longitudinal exposures of polar cod, ringed seals, beluga whales, and bowhead whales to polychlorinated biphenyl congener 153. Cross-sectional body burden-age trends were then produced by sampling resultant LBATs of successive birth cohorts at specific time points. As found previously for humans, the year of sampling relative to the year of peak environmental contamination was a critical parameter in determining male CBAT shapes. However, a similar cohort effect was not apparent for reproductive females because efficient POP loss through lactation prevented their lipids from retaining a memory of past exposure levels. Thus, lactation loss was not only responsible for the large differences between the CBATs of males and females of the same species, but also the lack of female CBAT variability through time. Cross-sectional body burden-age trend shapes varied little between species by lifespan, as long as equivalent age scales were used. However, lifespan relative to the timescale of environmental contaminant level changes did determine the extent to which CBATs resembled LBATs for males. We suggest that accounting for birth cohort and sex effects is essential when interpreting age trends in POP biomonitoring studies of long-lived species.
在野生动物生物监测中,持久性有机污染物 (POP) 水平与年龄之间的关系通常被解释为生物体随着年龄的增长而增加污染物负担。然而,从生物监测研究中获得的横断面体负荷-年龄趋势 (CBAT),即同时采样不同年龄的个体,不应与通过随时间重复采样同一个体获得的纵向体负荷-年龄趋势 (LBAT) 混淆。为了阐明野生动物物种的 CBAT 和 LBAT 如何相互偏离,并描述寿命和性别对其的任何影响,我们使用了基于机制的生物积累模型来估计北极鳕鱼、环斑海豹、白鲸和弓头鲸对多氯联苯同系物 153 的历史纵向暴露情况。然后,通过在特定时间点采样连续出生队列的 LBAT 来生成横断面体负荷-年龄趋势。与人类一样,相对于环境污染物峰值年份采样的年份是确定雄性 CBAT 形状的关键参数。然而,对于生殖雌性来说,类似的队列效应并不明显,因为通过哺乳有效地损失了 POP,从而阻止了其脂肪保留对过去暴露水平的记忆。因此,哺乳损失不仅是导致同一种雄性和雌性 CBAT 之间存在巨大差异的原因,也是导致雌性 CBAT 随时间变化的缺乏的原因。只要使用等效的年龄尺度,寿命对物种间的横断面体负荷-年龄趋势形状差异影响不大。然而,相对于环境污染物水平变化的时间尺度,寿命确实决定了雄性 CBAT 与 LBAT 相似的程度。我们建议,在解释寿命长的物种的 POP 生物监测研究中的年龄趋势时,考虑出生队列和性别的影响是至关重要的。