Faude Oliver, Steffen Anke, Kellmann Michael, Meyer Tim
Dept of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Nov;9(6):936-44. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0429. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
To analyze performance and fatigue effects of small-sided games (SSG) vs high-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed during a 4-wk in-season period in high-level youth football.
Nineteen players from 4 youth teams (16.5 [SD 0.8] y, 1.79 [0.06] m, 70.7 [5.6] kg) of the 2 highest German divisions completed the study. Teams were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 training sequences (2 endurance sessions per wk): One training group started with SSG, whereas the other group conducted HIIT during the first half of the competitive season. After the winter break, training programs were changed between groups. Before and after the training periods the following tests were completed: the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes, creatine kinase and urea concentrations, vertical-jump height (countermovement jump [CMJ], drop jump), straight sprint, agility, and an incremental field test to determine individual anaerobic threshold (IAT).
Significant time effects were observed for IAT (+1.3%, η(p)(2) = .31), peak heart rate (-1.8%, η(p)(2) = .45), and CMJ (-2.3%, η(p)(2) = .27), with no significant interaction between groups (P > .30). Players with low baseline IAT values (+4.3%) showed greater improvements than those with high initial values (± 0.0%). A significant decrease was found for total recovery (-5.0%, η(p)(2) = .29), and an increase was found for urea concentration (+9.2%, η(p)(2) = .44).
Four weeks of in-season endurance training can lead to relevant improvements in endurance capacity. The decreases in CMJ height and total-recovery score together with the increase in urea concentration might be interpreted as early signs of fatigue. Thus, the danger of overtaxing players should be considered.
分析在为期4周的赛季中,高水平青少年足球运动员进行小场地比赛(SSG)与高强度间歇训练(HIIT)的表现及疲劳影响。
来自德国最高两个级别联赛的4支青年队的19名球员(年龄16.5[标准差0.8]岁,身高1.79[0.06]米,体重70.7[5.6]千克)完成了该研究。球队被随机分配到2种训练方案之一(每周2次耐力训练课):一个训练组先进行小场地比赛训练,而另一组在赛季前半段进行高强度间歇训练。冬歇期后,两组训练方案互换。在训练期前后完成了以下测试:运动员恢复 - 压力问卷、肌酸激酶和尿素浓度、垂直跳高度(反向移动跳[CMJ]、下落跳)、直线冲刺、敏捷性以及确定个体无氧阈(IAT)的递增式场地测试。
观察到无氧阈有显著的时间效应(提高1.3%,η(p)(2)=.31)、峰值心率有显著时间效应(降低1.8%,η(p)(2)=.45)以及反向移动跳有显著时间效应(降低2.3%,η(p)(2)=.27),组间无显著交互作用(P>.30)。初始无氧阈低的球员(提高4.3%)比初始值高的球员(提高±0.0%)改善更大。发现总恢复有显著下降(降低5.0%,η(p)(2)=.29),尿素浓度有显著升高(升高9.2%,η(p)(2)=.44)。
为期4周的赛季耐力训练可使耐力能力得到相关改善。反向移动跳高度和总恢复得分的降低以及尿素浓度的升高可能被解释为疲劳的早期迹象。因此,应考虑球员过度训练的风险。