Attuel P, Pellerin D, Mugica J, Coumel P
Centre Medico-Chirurgical du Val d'Or, Saint-Cloud, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1647-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06289.x.
We performed atrial EP studies (atrial substrate evaluation) on 10 patients. These patients had evidence of paroxysmal, sustained, recurrent atrial arrhythmias (7 men and 3 women with a mean age of 64 +/- 15 years). All patients combined a brady-tachy syndrome; 7 patients had a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and 3 patients a typical vagally induced atrial arrhythmia. No anti-arrhythmic drug was allowed in 3 patients with SSS, 1 drug failed in 4 patients and the combination of 2 drugs failed in 3 patients during the first to eighth years prior to pacemaker implantation. Atrial substrate evaluation was feasible in all these patients off anti-arrhythmic therapy and showed important abnormalities of atrial loco-regional conduction parameters and long refractory periods (RP). The remarkable point was, in 7 patients, a paradoxical improvement in intra-atrial conduction delay at rapid pacing rate. The DDD pacing mode was chosen in all patients. No technical problem occurred during implantation. Atrial pacing rate was programmed to be slightly higher than the mean diurnal heart rate calculated on Holter monitoring. After implantation, the mean follow-up period was 18 +/- 25 months with an average of one Holter every 4 months during the first 2 years. The 7 patients who improved intra-atrial conduction at rapid pacing rate were controlled without drugs, 2 patients were controlled with 1 drug, and 1 patient with 2 drugs. Atrial pacing in the DDD mode in a selected group of patients prevents paroxysmal and drug-resistant atrial arrhythmias. Atrial substrate evaluation is a sensitive tool for assuring the long-term benefit of atrial pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们对10例患者进行了心房电生理研究(心房基质评估)。这些患者有阵发性、持续性、复发性房性心律失常的证据(7例男性和3例女性,平均年龄64±15岁)。所有患者均合并快慢综合征;7例患者有病态窦房结综合征(SSS),3例患者有典型的迷走神经介导的房性心律失常。在植入起搏器前的第1至8年,3例SSS患者未使用抗心律失常药物,4例患者使用1种药物无效,3例患者联合使用2种药物无效。在所有这些停用抗心律失常治疗的患者中,心房基质评估是可行的,并且显示出心房局部区域传导参数和长不应期(RP)有重要异常。值得注意的是,7例患者在快速起搏频率下房内传导延迟出现反常改善。所有患者均选择DDD起搏模式。植入过程中未出现技术问题。心房起搏频率设定为略高于动态心电图监测计算出的平均日间心率。植入后,平均随访期为18±25个月,前2年平均每4个月进行一次动态心电图检查。7例在快速起搏频率下房内传导改善的患者无需药物控制,2例患者用1种药物控制,1例患者用2种药物控制。对一组选定患者采用DDD模式进行心房起搏可预防阵发性和耐药性房性心律失常。心房基质评估是确保心房起搏长期获益的敏感工具。(摘要截断于250字)