Milder Ivon E J, Mikolajczak Jochen, van den Berg Saskia W, van de Veen-van Hofwegen Madelon, Bemelmans Wanda J E
1Centre for Nutrition,Prevention and Health Services,National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM),PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven,The Netherlands.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb;18(2):198-207. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000299. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
(i) To identify determinants of participation in the 'Healthy School Canteen Program', a programme that encourages schools to set up their canteen in a way that promotes healthy dietary behaviour. (ii) To compare food supply and actions between participating and non-participating schools. (iii) To investigate what reasons schools have to increase attention for nutrition in the curriculum.
A cross-sectional study based on information from questionnaires performed in 2010/2011.
All secondary schools (age group 12-18 years) in the Netherlands (n 1145).
Response was 33 % (n 375). Analyses included all schools with a canteen in which food is offered (28 %, n 325).
None of the investigated determinants was associated with participation. Participating schools offered significantly (P < 0·001) more of eleven inventoried healthy foods (e.g. sandwiches, (butter)milk, fruit, light soft drinks, yoghurt and salad) than non-participating schools. However, there was no difference in the number of less healthy products offered (e.g. candy bars, cakes and regular soft drinks). Participating schools reported more often that they took actions to improve dietary behaviour and more often had a policy on nutrition. Participating schools more often increased attention for nutrition in the curriculum in recent years than non-participating schools (57 % v. 43 %, P = 0·01). Reported reasons were similar and included media attention, eating behaviour of students and 'overweight'.
Schools that participate in the programme seemed to offer more healthy products in their canteens and took more actions to improve dietary behaviour than non-participating schools. However, at all schools less healthy foods were also available.
(i)确定参与“健康学校食堂计划”的决定因素,该计划鼓励学校以促进健康饮食行为的方式设立食堂。(ii)比较参与和未参与计划的学校之间的食品供应及措施。(iii)调查学校增加课程中营养关注度的原因。
基于2010/2011年问卷调查信息的横断面研究。
荷兰所有中学(年龄组12 - 18岁)(n = 1145)。
回复率为33%(n = 375)。分析包括所有设有提供食品的食堂的学校(28%,n = 325)。
所调查的决定因素均与参与情况无关。与未参与计划的学校相比,参与计划的学校显著(P < 0.001)提供了更多种类的11种已列出的健康食品(如三明治、(黄油)牛奶、水果、低糖软饮料、酸奶和沙拉)。然而,不健康食品的供应数量没有差异(如糖果棒、蛋糕和普通软饮料)。参与计划的学校更常报告采取行动改善饮食行为,且更常制定营养政策。近年来,参与计划的学校比未参与计划的学校更频繁地增加课程中营养方面的关注度(57%对43%,P = 0.01)。报告的原因相似,包括媒体关注、学生的饮食行为和“超重”问题。
参与该计划的学校在食堂似乎提供了更多健康食品,并且比未参与计划的学校采取了更多改善饮食行为的措施。然而,所有学校都有不健康食品供应。