• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

查理·布朗,你是个很棒的架构:连环漫画中叙事类别的分布。

You're a good structure, Charlie Brown: the distribution of narrative categories in comic strips.

作者信息

Cohn Neil

机构信息

Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(7):1317-59. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12116. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12116
PMID:24646175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4159446/
Abstract

Cohn's (2013) theory of "Visual Narrative Grammar" argues that sequential images take on categorical roles in a narrative structure, which organizes them into hierarchic constituents analogous to the organization of syntactic categories in sentences. This theory proposes that narrative categories, like syntactic categories, can be identified through diagnostic tests that reveal tendencies for their distribution throughout a sequence. This paper describes four experiments testing these diagnostics to provide support for the validity of these narrative categories. In Experiment 1, participants reconstructed unordered panels of a comic strip into an order that makes sense. Experiment 2 measured viewing times to panels in sequences where the order of panels was reversed. In Experiment 3, participants again reconstructed strips but also deleted a panel from the sequence. Finally, in Experiment 4 participants identified where a panel had been deleted from a comic strip and rated that strip's coherence. Overall, categories had consistent distributional tendencies within experiments and complementary tendencies across experiments. These results point toward an interaction between categorical roles and a global narrative structure.

摘要

科恩(2013)的“视觉叙事语法”理论认为,连续的图像在叙事结构中承担着分类角色,这种叙事结构将它们组织成类似于句子中句法类别组织的层次成分。该理论提出,叙事类别与句法类别一样,可以通过诊断测试来识别,这些测试揭示了它们在整个序列中的分布趋势。本文描述了四项实验来测试这些诊断方法,以支持这些叙事类别的有效性。在实验1中,参与者将一组无序的连环漫画面板重新排列成有意义的顺序。实验2测量了在面板顺序颠倒的序列中观看面板的时间。在实验3中,参与者再次重新排列连环漫画,但也从序列中删除了一个面板。最后,在实验4中,参与者识别出连环漫画中哪个面板被删除,并对该连环漫画的连贯性进行评分。总体而言,类别在实验中具有一致的分布趋势,在不同实验之间具有互补趋势。这些结果表明分类角色与整体叙事结构之间存在相互作用。

相似文献

1
You're a good structure, Charlie Brown: the distribution of narrative categories in comic strips.查理·布朗,你是个很棒的架构:连环漫画中叙事类别的分布。
Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;38(7):1317-59. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12116. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
2
Drawing the line between constituent structure and coherence relations in visual narratives.划分视觉叙事中组成结构与连贯关系之间的界限。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Feb;43(2):289-301. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000290. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension.视觉叙事的语法:序列图像理解中成分结构的神经证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
4
(Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension.视觉叙事的基本要素:连续图像理解中的结构和意义。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Aug;65(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
5
Zooming in on visual narrative comprehension.聚焦视觉叙事理解。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):451-466. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01101-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
6
The pieces fit: Constituent structure and global coherence of visual narrative in RSVP.各部分相互契合:RSVP中视觉叙事的成分结构与整体连贯性
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Feb;164:157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
The architecture of visual narrative comprehension: the interaction of narrative structure and page layout in understanding comics.视觉叙事理解的架构:漫画理解中叙事结构与页面布局的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 1;5:680. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00680. eCollection 2014.
8
Zooming in on the cognitive neuroscience of visual narrative.聚焦视觉叙事的认知神经科学。
Brain Cogn. 2020 Dec;146:105634. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105634. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
9
Visual narrative structure.视觉叙事结构。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;37(3):413-52. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12016. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
10
Your Brain on Comics: A Cognitive Model of Visual Narrative Comprehension.漫画中的大脑:视觉叙事理解的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):352-386. doi: 10.1111/tops.12421. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
From didactic explanations to co-design, sequential art and embodied learning: challenges, criticisms and future directions of patient pain education.从说教式解释到共同设计、序列艺术与体验式学习:患者疼痛教育的挑战、批评与未来方向
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 May 9;6:1536112. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1536112. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of autistic traits with inference generation in visual narratives.视觉叙事中自闭症特质与推理生成的关联
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01252-3.
3
Statistical characteristics of comic panel viewing times.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction, events, and the advantage of agents: the processing of semantic roles in visual narrative.预测、事件与主体优势:视觉叙事中语义角色的加工。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Nov;67(3):73-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
2
Visual narrative structure.视觉叙事结构。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;37(3):413-52. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12016. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
3
(Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension.视觉叙事的基本要素:连续图像理解中的结构和意义。
漫画板块观看时长的统计特征。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 20;13(1):20291. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47120-w.
4
A starring role for inference in the neurocognition of visual narratives.推理在视觉叙事的神经认知中的重要作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 15;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00270-9.
5
Narrative Skills in Primary School Children with Autism in Relation to Language and Nonverbal Temporal Sequencing.自闭症小学生的叙事技能与语言和非言语时间序列的关系。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Jun;49(3):475-489. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09703-w.
6
Editors' Introduction and Review: Visual Narrative Research: An Emerging Field in Cognitive Science.编辑引言与评论:视觉叙事研究:认知科学中的一个新兴领域。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):197-223. doi: 10.1111/tops.12473. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
7
Visual narrative comprehension: Universal or not?视觉叙事理解:普遍存在还是不存在?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):266-285. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01670-1.
8
The grammar of emoji? Constraints on communicative pictorial sequencing.表情符号的语法?对交际性图像序列的限制。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Aug 30;4(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0177-0.
9
The role of character goals and changes in body position in the processing of events in visual narratives.角色目标和身体姿势变化在视觉叙事中事件处理中的作用。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jul 8;4(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0176-1.
10
Your Brain on Comics: A Cognitive Model of Visual Narrative Comprehension.漫画中的大脑:视觉叙事理解的认知模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;12(1):352-386. doi: 10.1111/tops.12421. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Aug;65(1):1-38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
4
The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation.叙事电影中连续性剪辑对事件分割的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;35(8):1489-517. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP).三十年的探索:事件相关脑电位(ERP)中 N400 成分的意义发现。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
6
Starting at the end: the importance of goals in spatial language.从结尾说起:目标在空间语言中的重要性。
Cognition. 2005 May;96(1):1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
7
Situation models in language comprehension and memory.语言理解与记忆中的情境模型
Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):162-85. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.
8
Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.阅读无意义的句子:脑电活动反映语义不一致。
Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5. doi: 10.1126/science.7350657.
9
Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing of narratives in aphasia.失语症中叙事的语言和非语言加工
Brain Lang. 1982 May;16(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(82)90069-4.