Jeon Su-Young, Lee Chae-Young, Song Ki-Hoon, Kim Ki-Ho
Department of Dermatology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Department of Dermatology, Sorokdo National Hospital, Goheung, Korea.
Ann Dermatol. 2014 Feb;26(1):17-25. doi: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.1.17. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
The spectrophotometer is well known to be a useful tool for estimating the objective minimal erythema dose (MED) during planning of phototherapy protocol. However, only a few spectrophotometric values are used to evaluate the erythema and pigmentation of the MED site during phototesting.
To determinea new meaning of the relationships among spectrophotometric values during phototesting.
Twenty-five patients with psoriasis and 23 patients with vitiligo were selected before undergoing narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy. We interpreted the gross findings of erythema and measured the L()a()b() values using a spectrophotometer at each phototest spot. We compared MEDs, basic spectrophotometric values (L()a()b()), and b()/L() values separately according to skin type, and determined the correlation of each spectrophotometric value and the correlation between a() and b()/L(*) values.
Among L()a()b() values, only b() values showed a statistically significant difference between the type III and IV groups (p=0.003). There was a positive correlation only between MEDs and b() values (p<0.05). The average b()/L(*)value in the type IV group was significantly higher than the type III group (p<0.05).
The higher b() values in type IV skin indicates that skin tanning develops more prominently than type III. The correlation between MEDs and b() values may signify that the skin pigmentation status is deepened with the higher MEDs. The difference in b()/L()values between type III and IV skin reflects that the b()/L()value is thought to be an index of tanning. The a(*) value, known as an index of erythema, does not influence the degree of tanning.
在光疗方案规划过程中,分光光度计是用于估算客观最小红斑量(MED)的一种常用工具。然而,在光测试期间,仅有少数分光光度值用于评估MED部位的红斑和色素沉着情况。
确定光测试期间分光光度值之间关系的新意义。
选取25例银屑病患者和23例白癜风患者,在接受窄谱中波紫外线光疗前,我们对红斑的总体表现进行了解读,并使用分光光度计在每个光测试部位测量L()a()b()值。我们根据皮肤类型分别比较了MED、基本分光光度值(L()a()b())和b()/L()值,并确定了各分光光度值之间的相关性以及a()与b()/L(*)值之间的相关性。
在L()a()b()值中,仅b()值在III型和IV型组之间存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.003)。仅MED与b()值之间存在正相关(p < 0.05)。IV型组的平均b()/L(*)值显著高于III型组(p < 0.05)。
IV型皮肤中较高的b()值表明其皮肤晒黑比III型更明显。MED与b()值之间的相关性可能意味着随着MED升高,皮肤色素沉着状态加深。III型和IV型皮肤之间b()/L()值的差异反映出b()/L()值被认为是晒黑的一个指标。已知作为红斑指标的a(*)值不影响晒黑程度。