社会奖励问卷 (SRQ):编制与验证。
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation.
机构信息
Developmental Risk and Resilience Unit, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London London, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas Texas, TX, USA.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 11;5:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201. eCollection 2014.
Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N = 305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N = 505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RSMEA = 0.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes, and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards.
人类寻求社交互动作为奖励的来源。迄今为止,人们很少尝试识别不同形式的社交奖励,也不太了解社交奖励的价值在个体之间可能如何变化。本研究旨在通过开发社交奖励问卷 (SRQ) 来解决这两个问题,该问卷用于衡量不同社交奖励的个体差异。在最初的 75 个项目(N=305)上进行了探索性因素分析 (EFA)。在此分析的基础上,对第二个样本(N=505)进行了验证性因素分析 (CFA),使用了经过改进的 23 项量表。该分析用于测试一个六因素结构,结果表明模型拟合良好(CFI=0.96,RSMEA=0.07)。这些因素代表了社交奖励的六个亚量表,分别定义为:钦佩;负面社交效力;被动性;亲社会互动;性奖励;和社交性。所有分量表都表现出良好的重测信度和内部一致性。每个分量表还与测量人格特质、态度和目标的外部相关物呈现出独特的关联模式,从而证明了结构效度。总之,研究结果表明,SRQ 是一种可靠、有效的测量工具,可用于评估不同社交奖励的个体差异。
相似文献
Front Psychol. 2014-3-11
R Soc Open Sci. 2017-4-19
Psychol Assess. 2023-3
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019-9
Encephale. 2013-12
J Psychopharmacol. 2022-3
引用本文的文献
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024-12
Emotion. 2025-6
PLoS One. 2024-4-23
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023-8
本文引用的文献
Psychol Assess. 2019-3-21
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011-2-3
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013-12-2
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013-4-1
Psychol Assess. 2012-7-9
J Neurosci. 2012-6-27
Psychol Health. 2011-5-24
Psychol Assess. 2011-6
Psychol Assess. 2010-6