Takagaki Koki, Okamoto Yasumasa, Jinnin Ran, Mori Asako, Nishiyama Yoshiko, Yamamura Takanao, Yokoyama Satoshi, Shiota Syouichi, Okamoto Yuri, Miyake Yoshie, Ogata Akiko, Kunisato Yoshihiko, Shimoda Haruki, Kawakami Norito, Furukawa Toshi A, Yamawaki Shigeto
Health Service Center, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan,
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Oct 9;14:2633-2641. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S172385. eCollection 2018.
No significant effect of psychological treatment has been reported from meta-analysis of subthreshold depression patients and control subjects at 1-year follow-up. However, behavioral activation is a simpler and more cost-effective treatment than cognitive behavioral therapy. The primary purpose of this study was to assess by comparison to an assessment-only control group whether the effects of behavioral activation program for depressive symptoms can persist up to 1-year follow-up without the use of antidepressants or other psychotherapy.
Late adolescent students were the population targeted in this study. Participants were allocated randomly to an intervention group (n=62) or a control group (n=56). Treatment consisted of five-weekly 60-minute sessions. Participants underwent a structured interview and completed self-report scales at 1 year post-assessment.
Late adolescent students receiving treatment had significantly lower mean Beck Depression Inventory, second edition scores at 1-year follow-up than control group students. The effect size (Hedges' ) for between-group differences at 1-year follow-up was -0.41.
Our behavioral activation program is simple and short. Nevertheless, the results obtained at 1-year follow-up of the control group and late adolescent students receiving treatment indicated a significant difference in their Beck Depression Inventory, second edition scores. Our 5-week behavioral activation program based on behavioral characteristics for subthreshold depression might be promising for subthreshold depression. The sample examined for this study imposed some study limitations.
亚阈值抑郁症患者和对照组在1年随访期的荟萃分析中未报告心理治疗有显著效果。然而,行为激活疗法比认知行为疗法更简单且成本效益更高。本研究的主要目的是通过与仅进行评估的对照组比较,评估行为激活方案对抑郁症状的疗效在不使用抗抑郁药或其他心理治疗的情况下是否能持续到1年随访期。
本研究的目标人群为青少年晚期学生。参与者被随机分配到干预组(n = 62)或对照组(n = 56)。治疗包括每周一次、每次60分钟、共五周的疗程。参与者在评估后1年接受结构化访谈并完成自我报告量表。
接受治疗的青少年晚期学生在1年随访期的贝克抑郁量表第二版平均得分显著低于对照组学生。1年随访期组间差异的效应量(赫奇斯)为-0.41。
我们的行为激活方案简单且疗程短。然而,对照组和接受治疗的青少年晚期学生在1年随访期的结果表明,他们的贝克抑郁量表第二版得分存在显著差异。我们基于亚阈值抑郁症行为特征的5周行为激活方案对亚阈值抑郁症可能很有前景。本研究的样本存在一些研究局限性。